2007
DOI: 10.1086/522776
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evidence for a Population of High‐Redshift Submillimeter Galaxies from Interferometric Imaging

Abstract: We have used the Submillimeter Array to image a flux limited sample of seven submillimeter galaxies, selected by the AzTEC camera on the JCMT at 1.1 mm, in the COSMOS field at 890 µm with ∼ 2 ′′ resolution. All of the sources-two radio-bright and five radio-dim-are detected as single point-sources at high significance (> 6σ), with positions accurate to ∼ 0.2 ′′ that enable counterpart identification at other wavelengths observed with similarly high angular resolution. All seven have IRAC counterparts, but only… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

25
308
2

Year Published

2009
2009
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 171 publications
(335 citation statements)
references
References 78 publications
25
308
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Thus the DSFGs seen in GN20 are likely the galaxies that will evolve in to brightest cluster galaxies (BCGs). Capak et al (2011) examined the COSMOS data set, and found four galaxies at z ∼ 5.3, all centered around an extreme starburst originally detected with the AzTEC camera at 1.1 mm, COSMOS AzTEC-3 (Younger et al, 2007). The system has an inferred star formation rate of ∼ 1500 M yr −1 , and within 2 Mpc of the starburst, there are 11 objects with luminosities greater than L * .…”
Section: Environments Of Dsfgsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Thus the DSFGs seen in GN20 are likely the galaxies that will evolve in to brightest cluster galaxies (BCGs). Capak et al (2011) examined the COSMOS data set, and found four galaxies at z ∼ 5.3, all centered around an extreme starburst originally detected with the AzTEC camera at 1.1 mm, COSMOS AzTEC-3 (Younger et al, 2007). The system has an inferred star formation rate of ∼ 1500 M yr −1 , and within 2 Mpc of the starburst, there are 11 objects with luminosities greater than L * .…”
Section: Environments Of Dsfgsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…First, several works fit the longwavelength data ( > ∼ 50µm) to a single temperature modified blackbody and then cut-off the SED at short wavelengths and attach a power-law SED such that S (ν) ∝ ν −α where dS /dν < ∼ − α Younger et al, 2007Younger et al, , 2009bRoseboom et al, 2013). In other words,…”
Section: Direct Modified Blackbody Sed Modelingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Such extreme SFRs likely result from major mergers (e.g. Chapman et al 2004;Swinbank et al 2004;Greve et al 2005;Tacconi et al 2006Tacconi et al , 2008Younger et al 2007Younger et al , 2008Berciano Alba et al 2010;Narayanan et al 2009Narayanan et al , 2010 and cannot be sustained for a long period (after a few hundred Myr at most the gas reservoir should be depleted; see Greve et al 2005;Hainline et al 2006).…”
Section: Star Formation Ratesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Due to the coarse resolution of SCUBA, localizations derived from high-resolution radio maps had to be used to measure their spectroscopic redshifts . Lots of studies have addressed the issue of characterizing the nature of SMGs (Egami et al 2004;Greve et al 2004Greve et al , 2005Smail et al 2004;Swinbank et al 2004Swinbank et al , 2006Swinbank et al , 2008Takagi et al 2004;Alexander et al 2005;Borys et al 2005;Kovács et al 2006;Laurent et al 2006;Pope et al 2006;Tacconi et al 2006Tacconi et al , 2008Takata et al 2006;Younger et al 2007Younger et al , 2008Younger et al , 2009aClements et al 2008;Coppin et al 2008;Dye et al 2008Dye et al , 2009Hainline et al 2009;Perera et al 2008;Scott et al 2008;Austermann et al 2009;Devlin et al 2009;Eales et al 2009;Murphy et al 2009;Murphy 2009;Tamura et al 2009;Weiß et al 2009b;Aravena et al 2010, some of these works were based on surveys with sensitivity worse than 3 mJy quoted above). However they were usually based on limited samples ( 20 sources), limited wavelength coverage or photometric redshifts.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The source counterparts at other wavelengths can only be correctly identified if the exact location of the FIR/(sub)mm emission is known, which in practice requires the analysis of FIR or (sub)mm interferometric observations to achieve this goal (e.g. Frayer et al 2000;Younger et al 2007Younger et al , 2008Younger et al , 2009Dannerbauer et al 2008;Aravena et al 2010b;Smolčić et al 2012a,b;Karim et al 2013;Hodge et al 2013). To date, however, only a few fluxlimited SMG samples have been followed up with interferometers (Younger et al 2007Smolčić et al 2012b;Barger et al 2012;Karim et al 2013;Hodge et al 2013).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%