2006
DOI: 10.1007/s00122-006-0212-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evidence for a large-scale population structure of Arabidopsis thaliana from genome-wide single nucleotide polymorphism markers

Abstract: Population-based methods for the genetic mapping of adaptive traits and the analysis of natural selection require that the population structure and demographic history of a species are taken into account. We characterized geographic patterns of genetic variation in the model plant Arabidopsis thaliana by genotyping 115 genome-wide single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) markers in 351 accessions from the whole species range using a matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization time-of-flight assay, and by sequencin… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

10
134
2

Year Published

2006
2006
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 113 publications
(146 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
10
134
2
Order By: Relevance
“…However, this does not seem to have been the case in A. thaliana, relative to A. lyrata, which might be due to a population expansion following the evolution of selfing (Wright et al 2002). In addition, A. thaliana seems to have a more complicated population structure than would be expected for a self-fertilizing annual, suggesting that its effective population size might not be as small as previously thought (Nordborg et al 2005;Schmid et al 2006). …”
Section: Mechanisms Of Change In Genome Sizementioning
confidence: 76%
“…However, this does not seem to have been the case in A. thaliana, relative to A. lyrata, which might be due to a population expansion following the evolution of selfing (Wright et al 2002). In addition, A. thaliana seems to have a more complicated population structure than would be expected for a self-fertilizing annual, suggesting that its effective population size might not be as small as previously thought (Nordborg et al 2005;Schmid et al 2006). …”
Section: Mechanisms Of Change In Genome Sizementioning
confidence: 76%
“…We believe this difference is most likely due to recombination that occurred in the production of the F 5 plants. Due to their typically low rate of outcrossing (27), A. thaliana populations and stock accessions are mainly homozygous (35), and genetic variation among populations is highly structured (36). Interlocus associations are common within geographical areas (29,36), which may cause coadaptation of multiple genes and the overestimation of the effect of specific candidate genes.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Due to their typically low rate of outcrossing (27), A. thaliana populations and stock accessions are mainly homozygous (35), and genetic variation among populations is highly structured (36). Interlocus associations are common within geographical areas (29,36), which may cause coadaptation of multiple genes and the overestimation of the effect of specific candidate genes. It is also possible that FRI explains a smaller proportion of the variation in flowering time here than in other studies due to the particular environmental conditions used.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Because many demographic factors can affect patterns of nucleotide polymorphism in a way similar to the effects of selection, methods that can differentiate the effects of these forces are necessary before inferences can be made about their relative importance. Indeed, several recent studies have detected genome-wide departures from predictions of equilibrium neutral models in standard tests of selection (see Ford, 2002 for a review of such tests), presumably because of the effects of population genetic structure and demography (Andolfatto and Przeworski, 2000;Nordborg et al, 2005;Schmid et al, 2005Schmid et al, , 2006. Although application in more traditional ecological settings is limited, three recent papers have used alternative approaches to distinguish between demographic and selective forces in shaping human polymorphism levels Stajich and Hahn, 2005;Williamson et al, 2005), and some generalizations appear to be emerging.…”
Section: What Is Population Genomics?mentioning
confidence: 99%