1995
DOI: 10.1111/aae.1995.6.3.199
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evidence for a Kassite temple at Qala'at al‐Bahrain?

Abstract: Four stone blocks decorated with T‐shaped grooves indicate the presence of a Mesopotamian‐style temple in the tell of Qala'at al‐Bahrain on the north coast of the island of Bahrain.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The snake sacrifices have been attributed to periods IVc–d in the Qalat al‐Bahrain sequence, i.e. the Achaemenid period (10). Unfortunately, from an archaeological point of view, the deposits appear ‘contemporary’, in so far as the ceramics and beads associated with the snakes can all be referred to the same period, even if some comparanda may date slightly before or after the Achaemenid era.…”
Section: Chronologymentioning
confidence: 97%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…The snake sacrifices have been attributed to periods IVc–d in the Qalat al‐Bahrain sequence, i.e. the Achaemenid period (10). Unfortunately, from an archaeological point of view, the deposits appear ‘contemporary’, in so far as the ceramics and beads associated with the snakes can all be referred to the same period, even if some comparanda may date slightly before or after the Achaemenid era.…”
Section: Chronologymentioning
confidence: 97%
“…With respect to Nirah, there is little reason to see why such a seemingly minor deity would have been important in Dilmun, and any association with the snake sacrifices of the Achaemenid period has been dismissed by Højlund and Andersen who wrote, ‘The custom [snake sacrifice] is without precedence in Bahrain or elsewhere and it is doubtful whether the possible reference to a snake deity in one of the Kassite cuneiform tablets...is relevant’ (67). The chronological gap separating the very uncertain reference to Nirah, in the Kassite period, from the snake sacrifices of the Achaemenid era is almost 1000 years long, and Eidem's admittedly very cautious hypothesis is hardly satisfying since it is not accompanied by any evidence which confirms Nirah's significance in contemporary Achaemenid Mesopotamia or which might help explain the archaeological context of the Bahrain snakes.…”
Section: Evaluating the Case For Foreign Religious Praxis In Achaemenmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 3 more Smart Citations