1998
DOI: 10.1016/s1384-1076(98)00024-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evidence for a Galactic gamma-ray halo

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

7
67
0

Year Published

1999
1999
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 82 publications
(74 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
7
67
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Atomic gas (often identified as HVCs) is observed in the radio band (particularly at 21 cm) and through absorption lines towards field stars and quasars. The hot gas may be detected in X-rays, while searches for cold gas clouds in galactic halos are more problematic as are searches for them by the presence of a gamma-ray halo (Dixon et al 1998;De Paolis et al 1999), stellar scintillations (Moniez 2003;Habibi et al 2010), obscuration events towards the LMC (Drake & Cook 2003), ortho-H 2 D + line at 372 GHz (Ceccarelli & Dominik 2006), and extreme scattering events in quasar radioflux variations (Walker & Wardle 1998) have given no clear indication of their presence.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Atomic gas (often identified as HVCs) is observed in the radio band (particularly at 21 cm) and through absorption lines towards field stars and quasars. The hot gas may be detected in X-rays, while searches for cold gas clouds in galactic halos are more problematic as are searches for them by the presence of a gamma-ray halo (Dixon et al 1998;De Paolis et al 1999), stellar scintillations (Moniez 2003;Habibi et al 2010), obscuration events towards the LMC (Drake & Cook 2003), ortho-H 2 D + line at 372 GHz (Ceccarelli & Dominik 2006), and extreme scattering events in quasar radioflux variations (Walker & Wardle 1998) have given no clear indication of their presence.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…photons cm −2 s −1 sr −1 above 1 GeV is claimed even after correction for the expected background of cosmic rays and the diffuse extragalactic emission [58]. These residual intensities although marginal have rather interesting implications for the halo density profile.…”
Section: A Flux From the Galactic Halomentioning
confidence: 91%
“…These residual intensities although marginal have rather interesting implications for the halo density profile. We computed the expected intensity, averaged over cells of 0.5 o × 0.5 o as considered in [58], in the direction b = 90 o . Table 3 gives the expected intensity as a function of the neutralino mass for the α-profile (with a central cusp) and the Plummer profile (with a central core).…”
Section: A Flux From the Galactic Halomentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As a result of this freedom in modelling, the γ-ray data must be regarded as inconclusive at present. However, we note that Dixon et al (1998) discovered an unmodelled Galactic 'halo' component in the γ-ray background, and the simplest explanation for this is that it is due to unseen (cold, dense) gas.…”
Section: Non-thermal Emissionmentioning
confidence: 82%