1992
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.89.23.11269
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evidence for a base-pairing interaction between U6 small nuclear RNA and 5' splice site during the splicing reaction in yeast.

Abstract: U6 small nuclear RNA (snRNA) is an essential factor in mRNA splicing. On the basis of the high conservation of its sequence, it has been proposed that U6 suRNA may function catalytically during the splicing reaction. If this is the case, it is likely that U6 snRNA interacts with the splice sites in the spliceosome to catalyze the reaction. We have used UV crosslinking to analyze the interactions of U6 snRNA with the splicing substrates during the yeast splicing reaction.Crosslinked products in which the centra… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

7
107
0

Year Published

1993
1993
2011
2011

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 141 publications
(114 citation statements)
references
References 51 publications
(63 reference statements)
7
107
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Trans-splicing reactions employing progressive rounds of selected exonic sequences+ A: Trans-splicing of the wild-type starting construct compared to rounds 0-7 of the successive selected sequences+ An authentic trans-splicing substrate is also shown for comparison+ Splicing reactions were incubated for the indicated time in minutes+ Shaded boxes represent trans-spliced exons, lines indicate intronic regions, and striped boxes correspond to the transspliced leader exon (SL)+ B: Graph of splicing efficiency plotted for each of the selected rounds+ The average trans-splicing efficiency for three independent sets of splicing reactions was graphed+ From this analysis, it is clear that precursor turnover leveled off after the fourth round+ C: Splicing time course comparing the initial randomized pool with the final round+ Again, an authentic trans-splicing substrate is included for comparison+ Trans-splicing reactions proceeded for the indicated time+ Substrates and products are indicated as above+ 7+1 (3XSGACS) sequences acts as an efficient competitor for both self-competition (Fig+ 4A, lanes 8-11) as well as on the splicing of clone 7+2 (59ss; Fig+ 4B, lanes 8-11)+ Thus, because the SGACS-containing competitor acts as an effective inhibitor of the 59 splicecontaining substrate (7+2), it presumably titrates out a factor(s) required for general trans-splicing and not just a factor(s) necessary for the specific trans-splicing of substrates containing the SGACS motif+ A similar profile was observed when the exon from clone 7+2 (59ss) FIGURE 3. Isolation of individual sequences from the mixed pools+ A: Discrete sequences are grouped according to the elements that they contain+ For the SGACS, ACE-like, and RRGAGS elements, individual motifs are underlined+ S ϭ G or C; N ϭ A, C, G or U; W ϭ A or U+ Upper case letters indicate bases within the 18n randomized region, lower case letters indicate surrounding sequences+ Outlined letters (clone 2+3) indicate a change in the sequence of the surrounding sequence+ Sequences that fall into the 59 splice site-like category are drawn in a proposed base paired interaction with the 59 end of A. lumbricoides U1 snRNA (Shambaugh et al+, 1994) B: Transsplicing of individual selected sequences versus the wild-type starting construct+ Clone 7+1 contains three copies of the SGACS motif (3XSGACS) and clone 7+2 contains a 9 out of 9 complementarity to the 59 end of U1 (59 ss)+ Splicing reactions were incubated for the indicated times+ Precursors and products are indicated as in the legend to Figure 2+ was examined+ This competitor led to a substantial reduction in the trans-splicing efficiency of both the 7+1 (3XSGACS) (Fig+ 4A, lanes 12-15) and self 7+2 (59ss) substrates (Fig+ 4B, lanes 12-15)+ This result is intriguing because it demonstrates that a 59 splice sitecontaining RNA is able to compete for trans-splicing, even though the reaction does not require the 59 end of U1 (Hannon et al+, 1991)+ Therefore, other factors required for trans-splicing are presumably titrated away by the presence of excess 59 splice sites+ Possible candidates include p220/Prp8 (Wyatt et al+, 1992;Reyes et al+, 1996) and U6 snRNP (Sawa & Abelson, 1992;Wassarman & Steitz, 1992)+ Because the only difference between the three competitor fragments lies within the 18-nt region that was the focus of the selection procedure, the effects on trans-splicing efficiency can be directly attributed to this region+ To extend the characterization of the competitor RNAs, we investigated their effects on the splicing of authentic nematode trans-and cis-...…”
Section: Selection Of Exonic Elements Capable Of Enhancing Trans-splimentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Trans-splicing reactions employing progressive rounds of selected exonic sequences+ A: Trans-splicing of the wild-type starting construct compared to rounds 0-7 of the successive selected sequences+ An authentic trans-splicing substrate is also shown for comparison+ Splicing reactions were incubated for the indicated time in minutes+ Shaded boxes represent trans-spliced exons, lines indicate intronic regions, and striped boxes correspond to the transspliced leader exon (SL)+ B: Graph of splicing efficiency plotted for each of the selected rounds+ The average trans-splicing efficiency for three independent sets of splicing reactions was graphed+ From this analysis, it is clear that precursor turnover leveled off after the fourth round+ C: Splicing time course comparing the initial randomized pool with the final round+ Again, an authentic trans-splicing substrate is included for comparison+ Trans-splicing reactions proceeded for the indicated time+ Substrates and products are indicated as above+ 7+1 (3XSGACS) sequences acts as an efficient competitor for both self-competition (Fig+ 4A, lanes 8-11) as well as on the splicing of clone 7+2 (59ss; Fig+ 4B, lanes 8-11)+ Thus, because the SGACS-containing competitor acts as an effective inhibitor of the 59 splicecontaining substrate (7+2), it presumably titrates out a factor(s) required for general trans-splicing and not just a factor(s) necessary for the specific trans-splicing of substrates containing the SGACS motif+ A similar profile was observed when the exon from clone 7+2 (59ss) FIGURE 3. Isolation of individual sequences from the mixed pools+ A: Discrete sequences are grouped according to the elements that they contain+ For the SGACS, ACE-like, and RRGAGS elements, individual motifs are underlined+ S ϭ G or C; N ϭ A, C, G or U; W ϭ A or U+ Upper case letters indicate bases within the 18n randomized region, lower case letters indicate surrounding sequences+ Outlined letters (clone 2+3) indicate a change in the sequence of the surrounding sequence+ Sequences that fall into the 59 splice site-like category are drawn in a proposed base paired interaction with the 59 end of A. lumbricoides U1 snRNA (Shambaugh et al+, 1994) B: Transsplicing of individual selected sequences versus the wild-type starting construct+ Clone 7+1 contains three copies of the SGACS motif (3XSGACS) and clone 7+2 contains a 9 out of 9 complementarity to the 59 end of U1 (59 ss)+ Splicing reactions were incubated for the indicated times+ Precursors and products are indicated as in the legend to Figure 2+ was examined+ This competitor led to a substantial reduction in the trans-splicing efficiency of both the 7+1 (3XSGACS) (Fig+ 4A, lanes 12-15) and self 7+2 (59ss) substrates (Fig+ 4B, lanes 12-15)+ This result is intriguing because it demonstrates that a 59 splice sitecontaining RNA is able to compete for trans-splicing, even though the reaction does not require the 59 end of U1 (Hannon et al+, 1991)+ Therefore, other factors required for trans-splicing are presumably titrated away by the presence of excess 59 splice sites+ Possible candidates include p220/Prp8 (Wyatt et al+, 1992;Reyes et al+, 1996) and U6 snRNP (Sawa & Abelson, 1992;Wassarman & Steitz, 1992)+ Because the only difference between the three competitor fragments lies within the 18-nt region that was the focus of the selection procedure, the effects on trans-splicing efficiency can be directly attributed to this region+ To extend the characterization of the competitor RNAs, we investigated their effects on the splicing of authentic nematode trans-and cis-...…”
Section: Selection Of Exonic Elements Capable Of Enhancing Trans-splimentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the newly formed spliceosome, a specific sequence of U5 interacts with the exon sequences at the 5' and 3' splice sites (Newman and Norman, 1991;Newman and Norman, 1992;Wyatt et al, 1992;Cortes et al, 1993;Sontheimer and Steitz, 1993), and other sequences of U4 and U6 base-pair with each other. Then, before the first step of splicing occurs, the spliceosome undergoes dynamic changes, resulting in the departure of U1 and U4, and the formation of new duplexes, including those between U2 and U6, and between U6 and the 5' splice site (Hausner et al, 1990;Datta and Weiner, 1991;Wu and Manley, 1991;Yean and Lin, 1991;Madhani and Guthrie, 1992;Sawa and Abelson, 1992;Wassarman and Steitz, 1992;Lesser and Guthrie, 1993;Nilsen, 1994). The resulting conformational changes lead to the formation of the active spliceosome (complex B2), triggering the first step of splicing, where the bulged-out branch point adenosine nucleophilically attacks the phosphate at the 5' splice site.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, an evolutionarily invariant region in U6, the ACAGAGA box ( Fig. 1 A), is in close proximity to the splice sites during splicing catalysis (14)(15)(16)(17)(18), and mutagenesis studies have shown that this domain plays a crucial role in catalysis of the splicing reaction (7,10,11). Two other conserved regions, the AGC triad and an asymmetric bulge in the intramolecular stemloop of U6 (ISL), are also thought to play important roles in spliceosomal catalysis (11).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%