1995
DOI: 10.1021/bi00013a016
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evidence by Site-Directed Mutagenesis Supports Long-Range Electron Transfer in Mouse Ribonucleotide Reductase

Abstract: Mammalian ribonucleotide reductase consists of two nonidentical subunits, proteins R1 and R2, each inactive alone. The R1 protein binds the ribonucleotide substrates while the R2 protein contains a binuclear iron center and a tyrosyl free radical, essential for activity. The crystal structures of the corresponding Escherichia coli proteins suggest that the distance from the active site in R1 to the tyrosyl radical buried in R2 is about 35 A. Therefore, an electron pathway was suggested between the active site … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

9
120
0

Year Published

1996
1996
2007
2007

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 116 publications
(130 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
9
120
0
Order By: Relevance
“…5,6). Site-directed mutagenesis has been employed to provide evidence that these residues are essential for radical initiation [9][10][11][12][13] . However, these mutants have not been mechanistically informative, as they exhibit only marginal catalytic activity probably associated to residual wild-type contamination of the purified mutants.…”
Section: Problem Under Investigationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…5,6). Site-directed mutagenesis has been employed to provide evidence that these residues are essential for radical initiation [9][10][11][12][13] . However, these mutants have not been mechanistically informative, as they exhibit only marginal catalytic activity probably associated to residual wild-type contamination of the purified mutants.…”
Section: Problem Under Investigationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The specific substrate reaction takes place in the larger R1 component, whereas the free radical on a tyrosyl side chain required for enzyme activity is generated in the smaller R2 component on Tyr-122 (1-3). It has been proposed that the substrate binding site in R1 is connected to Tyr-122 in the R2 component by an array of conserved hydrogen-bonded amino acids (4 -6), considered to take part in a coupled electron/proton (H ⅐ radical) transfer between the two proteins during the enzymatic reaction (2,(7)(8)(9)(10). The tyrosyl radical is formed together with a -oxo-bridged diferric center in a reconstitution reaction involving ferrous iron and molecular oxygen.…”
Section: IIImentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1). The iron ligands (Asp-84, Glu-115, His-118, Glu-204, Glu-238, His-241) (6,46), the tyrosyl free radical (Tyr-122) (5,6,46), the residues in the hydrophobic pocket surrounding the radical (Phe-208, Phe-212, Ile-234) (6,46), and the residues that are proposed to participate in the long-range electron transport pathway (Trp-48, Asp-237, Glu-350, Tyr-356) (6,8,9,46), are all conserved (E. coli class Ia numbering is used throughout the text unless stated otherwise). A striking difference between the mouse and the T. brucei R2 proteins is that the mouse R2 protein is larger due to 53 extra residues in the N terminus.…”
Section: Cloning and Sequencing Of T Brucei R1 And R2 Cdnasmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The large R1 subunit binds substrates and allosteric effectors, while the small R2 subunit contains a tyrosyl radical (5), generated by a binuclear ferric iron center. The tyrosyl radical in the R2 protein is linked to the active site in the R1 subunit through a hydrogen-bonded long-range electron transport chain (6)(7)(8)(9)(10). Class II RNR generates a radical from 5Ј-deoxyadenosylcobalamin (11,12) and class III RNR, which only works under anaerobic conditions, contains a stable glycyl radical (13).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%