2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.asj.2009.02.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evidence-Based Use of Pulsed Electromagnetic Field Therapy in Clinical Plastic Surgery

Abstract: This review shows that plastic surgeons have at hand a powerful tool with no known side effects for the adjunctive, noninvasive, nonpharmacologic management of postoperative pain and edema. Given the recent rapid advances in development of portable and economical PEMF devices, what has been of most significance to the plastic surgeon is the laboratory and clinical confirmation of decreased pain and swelling following injury or surgery.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
70
0
3

Year Published

2010
2010
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 107 publications
(84 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
2
70
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Our numerical model demonstrates that by non-contact application of an EF, we can induce a sufficient EF in the cell membrane and cytoplasm to manipulate protein expression and activate intracellular pathways as supported by our experimental results [3]. Such numerical modelling of EF -cell interactions is an essential and necessary part of the clinical translation process; it helps to establish therapeutic concepts and to advance approaches toward the development of non-pharmacological EF therapies [106][107][108], which can be applied locally and without direct contact with tissue [101,105,[109][110][111][112]. Importantly, our theoretical approach can be generalized to investigate the interaction of EF with cells of an arbitrary shape.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 81%
“…Our numerical model demonstrates that by non-contact application of an EF, we can induce a sufficient EF in the cell membrane and cytoplasm to manipulate protein expression and activate intracellular pathways as supported by our experimental results [3]. Such numerical modelling of EF -cell interactions is an essential and necessary part of the clinical translation process; it helps to establish therapeutic concepts and to advance approaches toward the development of non-pharmacological EF therapies [106][107][108], which can be applied locally and without direct contact with tissue [101,105,[109][110][111][112]. Importantly, our theoretical approach can be generalized to investigate the interaction of EF with cells of an arbitrary shape.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 81%
“…Small differences in these field magnitudes can cause changes in the configuration of certain proteins, and produce effects at the cell and organism level [McCaig et al, 2005;Céspedes and Ueno, 2009]. These effects are reproducible and are currently being evaluated for therapeutic applications [Pilla, 2002[Pilla, , 2006Nuccitelli, 2003;Volpe, 2003;Balakatounis and Angoules, 2008;Colbert et al, 2009;Strauch et al, 2009]. However, the mechanism or mechanisms of action remain an open question [Eremenko et al, 1997;Harland et al, 1999;Cook et al, 2002;Barnes, 2006].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…A potential mechanism of action for PRFE therapy has been put forward and is reviewed by Strauch et al [28]. Moreover, recent reports have further contributed to understanding concerning the mechanisms of PRFE therapy for wound healing [29,30].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%