2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.injury.2014.10.011
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evidence based update: Open versus closed reduction

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
44
0
2

Year Published

2015
2015
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 55 publications
(46 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
0
44
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The healing of a femoral neck fracture is dependent on the damage to the circulation of the femoral head caused by the trauma at the time of fracture, and also on the biomechanical stability provided by the osteosynthesis devices. Accurate fracture reduction and placement of implants is important for a good outcome [28]. The literature suggests union rates of 85-97% in undisplaced fractures and 70-74% in displaced fractures treated by internal fixation [29].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The healing of a femoral neck fracture is dependent on the damage to the circulation of the femoral head caused by the trauma at the time of fracture, and also on the biomechanical stability provided by the osteosynthesis devices. Accurate fracture reduction and placement of implants is important for a good outcome [28]. The literature suggests union rates of 85-97% in undisplaced fractures and 70-74% in displaced fractures treated by internal fixation [29].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Only one randomised controlled trial has investigated ORIF versus closed reduction internal fixation (CRIF), this without a difference in subsequent nonunion or avascular necrosis [12], but with a higher infection rate following ORIF than CRIF (9.1% vs. 2.1%). Ghayoumi et al [36] reviewed 21 non-randomised studies and confirmed that there was no difference when comparing ORIF with CRIF concerning non-union (14.9% vs 11.6%) and avascular necrosis (17.7% vs. 17.2%), but there was an increased risk of deep wound infection for ORIF (3.9% vs 0.5%). The evidence is of suboptimal quality, including relatively small patient numbers, with just 181 patients in the ORIF versus 612 patients in the CRIF group.…”
Section: For Achieving Anatomical Reduction An Open Reduction and Inmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Proper anatomic reduction and stable internal xation is the key to preserve the femoral head, avoiding avascular necrosis, nonunion, and femur shortening 20 .The Pauwels type-III femoral neck fractures in young adult patients are often the result of high-energy trauma. approximately 70% of the cases of the fracture are combined with communited fractures in the posterior-medial of the femoral neck,which may reduce postoperative xation stability and increase the risk of complications such as nonunion and osteonecrosis 21,22 .moreover,Previous studies have shown that the risk of fracture instability increases signi cantly when the fracture area exceeded 25% of the posterior femoral neck regions 23 .Kauffman et al show that compared with femurs xed with three screws, four screws have signi cantly higher resistance to axial and forward displacement, and the axial destructive force continues to decrease 12 .In our study,all 14 patients were treated with PSTCS according to the femoral neck fracture morphology,all patient achieved a stable xation and did not experience re-displacement of the fracture after the operation during follow-up.The PSTCS can stabilize the fracture end in multiple planes ,placing a pauwels screw through the fracture line at a 90-degree angle may achieve optimal control of the shear force at the fracture end and effectively reduce the occurrence of postoperative internal failure rate.Besides this,in actual clinical practice,the relatively complete and supportable sections of the fracture ends are xed preferentially.It also can reduce the incidence and degree of the femoral neck shortening and the rotation of femoral head caused by excessive compression of the screw in the comminuted fracture part.However,the effect of fracture morphology on internal xation of Pauwels type-III femoral neck fracture is often overlooked by most Orthopedic surgeons in clinical work.Currently, Pauwels classi cation system is still the practical mainstay of femoral neck fracture characterization that help dictate appropriate treatment ,although some scholars believe that Classi cation of intra-capsular hip fractures according to the Pauwels classi cation using the Pauwels angle is unreliable and its use should be avoided 24 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%