2016
DOI: 10.1186/s12906-016-1175-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evidence-based practice, research utilization, and knowledge translation in chiropractic: a scoping review

Abstract: BackgroundEvidence-based practice (EBP) gaps are widespread across health disciplines. Understanding factors supporting the uptake of evidence can inform the design of strategies to narrow these EBP gaps. Although research utilization (RU) and the factors associated with EBP have been reported in several health disciplines, to date this area has not been reviewed comprehensively in the chiropractic profession. The purpose of this review was to report on the current state of knowledge on EBP, RU, and knowledge … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
49
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 54 publications
(49 citation statements)
references
References 104 publications
0
49
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These conceptualizations, while useful and accurate descriptions of present realities, likely limit understanding of the full applicability of the sciences and preclude key opportunities for synergy. For example, when translation is defined only as "the process of turning observations into interventions," [1] there is an assumption that "improvement in health" will be achieved by developing effective interventions alone, and that D&I barriers will be overcome naturallydespite a large body of evidence showing this is not the case [15][16][17][18][19][20]. Similarly, D&I sciences, in their effort to understand how best to scale up evidence-based practices, may fail to appreciate barriers to efficiently building strong, generalizable evidence and useful and usable interventions worth disseminating and implementing, as well as the role that the applicability and quality of evidence plays in the success of D&I efforts.…”
Section: The Integrating Principlesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These conceptualizations, while useful and accurate descriptions of present realities, likely limit understanding of the full applicability of the sciences and preclude key opportunities for synergy. For example, when translation is defined only as "the process of turning observations into interventions," [1] there is an assumption that "improvement in health" will be achieved by developing effective interventions alone, and that D&I barriers will be overcome naturallydespite a large body of evidence showing this is not the case [15][16][17][18][19][20]. Similarly, D&I sciences, in their effort to understand how best to scale up evidence-based practices, may fail to appreciate barriers to efficiently building strong, generalizable evidence and useful and usable interventions worth disseminating and implementing, as well as the role that the applicability and quality of evidence plays in the success of D&I efforts.…”
Section: The Integrating Principlesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There is often a gap between theoretical knowledge and it is applied upon practical area [10]. Evidence-based practice and research utilization are concepts related to the identification, utilization and application of knowledge from research findings to clinical practice [11]. The focus should be upon manipulating factors at work place as well as learning environment that leads to less cost of health care and decrease patients suffering [12].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1 Evidence-based practice (EBP) has been incorporated into health education worldwide because clinical research evidence is increasingly seen as a vital element of clinical decision making. [2][3][4] The ''driving force'' behind evidence-based medicine since the 1980s has been David Sackett 5 at McMaster University in Canada. In his words, evidence-based medicine integrates ''individual clinical expertise with the best available external clinical evidence from systematic research.''…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%