Evidence-Based Policy Making: Assessment of the American Heart Association’s Strategic Policy Portfolio

Abstract

Background-American Heart Association (AHA) public policy advocacy strategies are based on its Strategic Impact Goals.The writing group appraised the evidence behind AHA's policies to determine how well they address the association's 2020 cardiovascular health (CVH) metrics and cardiovascular disease (CVD) management indicators and identified research needed to fill gaps in policy and support further policy development. Methods and Results-The AHA policy research department first identified current AHA policies specific to each CVH metric and CVD management indicator and the evidence underlying each policy. Writing group members then reviewed each policy and the related metrics and indicators. The results of each review were summarized, and topic-specific priorities and overarching themes for future policy research were proposed. There was generally close alignment between current AHA policies and the 2020 CVH metrics and CVD management indicators; however, certain specific policies still lack a robust evidence base. For CVH metrics, the distinction between policies for adults (age ≥20 years) and children (<20 years) was often not considered, although policy approaches may differ importantly by age. Inclusion of all those <20 years of age as a single group also ignores important differences in policy needs for infants, children, adolescents, and young adults. For CVD management indicators, specific quantitative targets analogous to criteria for ideal, intermediate, and poor CVH are lacking but needed to assess progress toward the 2020 goal to reduce deaths from CVDs and stroke. New research in support of current policies needs to focus on the evaluation of their translation and implementation through expanded application of implementation science. Focused basic, clinical, and population research is required to expand and strengthen the evidence base for the development of new policies. Evaluation of the impact of targeted © 2016 American Heart Association, Inc.Circulation is available at http://circ.ahajournals.org DOI: 10.1161/CIR.0000000000000410The American Heart Association makes every effort to avoid any actual or potential conflicts of interest that may arise as a result of an outside relationship or a personal, professional, or business interest of a member of the writing panel. Specifically, all members of the writing group are required to complete and submit a Disclosure Questionnaire showing all such relationships that might be perceived as real or potential conflicts of interest.This policy statement was approved by the Advocacy Coordinating Committee February 23, 2016, and the American Heart Association Executive Committee on February 23, 2016. A copy of the document is available at http://professional.heart.org/statements by using either "Search for Guidelines & Statements" or the "Browse by Topic" area. To purchase additional reprints, call 843-216-2533 or e-mail kelle.ramsay@wolterskluwer.com.The American Heart Association requests that this document be cited as follows: Labarthe DR, Goldstein LB,...

Sex and Racial Disparities in Cardiac Rehabilitation Referral at Hospital Discharge and Gaps in Long‐Term Mortality

“…The Million Hearts Initiatives from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention set a goal to achieve >70% participation in CR/secondary prevention programs by the year 2022 10. The American Heart Association and the American College of Cardiology recommend CR referral before hospital discharge as a Class I recommendation and listed assessing the impact of better CR referral, initiation, and participation on population outcomes as priority areas 11. In order to participate in a CR program, patients must first receive a referral from their physician.…”

“…10 The American Heart Association and the American College of Cardiology recommend CR referral before hospital discharge as a Class I recommendation and listed assessing the impact of better CR referral, initiation, and participation on population outcomes as priority areas. 11 In order to participate in a CR program, patients must first receive a referral from their physician. CR referral is recommended for eligible patients regardless of their sex, race, or geographic location.…”

Bringing Rigor to the Use of Evidence in Policy Making: Translating Early Evidence

“…There are many other such lists that seek to synthesize empirical information beyond the efficacy estimates from RCTs. Approaches such as QuIC embed strategic review within its process—potentially representing the next revolution in organizing evidence for policy making (Labarthe et al ).…”

Physical education policy compliance and Latino children’s fitness: Does the association vary by school neighborhood socioeconomic advantage?

“…For nearly two decades, there has been strong interest in environmental and policy interventions that promote healthy eating, physical activity and healthy weight, particularly in school settings[1–4]. The National Academy of Sciences and the American Heart Association recommended that schools play a central role to prevent childhood obesity by increasing physical activity and fitness levels through different strategies including physical education[2,3].…”