“…Miles notes that this concession from the original posturing [12] has been a major one, but that it continues to represent nothing more than a further example of the serial reconstitutions (rather than slow, thoughtful, evolutionary development in thinking) that have characterised the short history of EBM and which are sure to be documented with comment by the History of Medicine. Notwithstanding these concessions, there appears for the protagonists of EBM to be 'an odd distinction between "evidence" from an expert and "evidence" from a literature search, as if they are somehow different species of authority, incapable of interbreeding' [43]. For Miles [44], the observations made by some that EBM is not against expertise per se, but rather that it values different types of expertise differently, therefore appears unsupportable.…”