2022
DOI: 10.1080/17441692.2021.2020319
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evidence attack in public health: Diverse actors’ experiences with translating controversial or misrepresented evidence in health policy and systems research

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 54 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Nevertheless, we expanded the initial literature search strategy in order to include index terms and text terms that are expected to increase the likelihood of detecting eligible studies. Furthermore the focus on CHPI and HIV transmission, the diversity of included study and the fact that almost half of the included studies did not show a significant impact on HIV transmission is comforting with respect to publication bias [121].…”
Section: Strengths and Limitationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nevertheless, we expanded the initial literature search strategy in order to include index terms and text terms that are expected to increase the likelihood of detecting eligible studies. Furthermore the focus on CHPI and HIV transmission, the diversity of included study and the fact that almost half of the included studies did not show a significant impact on HIV transmission is comforting with respect to publication bias [121].…”
Section: Strengths and Limitationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Within the scope of electoral democracy, there appears to be an important link between journalism and health policy, but these three things have a complex relationship. The sidelining of the role of journalism (media) in disseminating information and framing public health issues deserves serious attention from advocates, policy analysts, and academics in this field, as it affects voter and policymaker misunderstanding, silence, and policy neglect that impacts how much health issues are included in political decisions (Jessani et al, 2022;Picard, 2020).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%