2011
DOI: 10.1002/9780470950050
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evidence and Procedures for Boundary Location

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 0 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…While in a strict, legally deterministic sense it may be argued that equating documentary evidence to forms of customary evidence can detract from the integrity of the document in matters relating to land and property, such a concern is out of place where most do not have documentary evidence, and very much out of place after prolonged armed conflict. At the same time it is well within the Western legal tradition (where Liberia's own formal legal history resides) to hold that 'relevancy' is the primary evidence rule in civil cases (Dennis, 1999;Murphy, 2003;Robillard et al, 2002). With such a rule guiding the admission of evidence, and a wide variety of formal and informal evidence therefore admissible, both East Timor and Mozambique have found that many disputes became 'self-resolving' out of court (due to the fear by one or both parties that they might lose the claim entirely), thus sidestepping in many cases the problem of lack of access to courts (Unruh, 2006).…”
Section: The Evidence Problemmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While in a strict, legally deterministic sense it may be argued that equating documentary evidence to forms of customary evidence can detract from the integrity of the document in matters relating to land and property, such a concern is out of place where most do not have documentary evidence, and very much out of place after prolonged armed conflict. At the same time it is well within the Western legal tradition (where Liberia's own formal legal history resides) to hold that 'relevancy' is the primary evidence rule in civil cases (Dennis, 1999;Murphy, 2003;Robillard et al, 2002). With such a rule guiding the admission of evidence, and a wide variety of formal and informal evidence therefore admissible, both East Timor and Mozambique have found that many disputes became 'self-resolving' out of court (due to the fear by one or both parties that they might lose the claim entirely), thus sidestepping in many cases the problem of lack of access to courts (Unruh, 2006).…”
Section: The Evidence Problemmentioning
confidence: 99%