2014
DOI: 10.2807/1560-7917.es2014.19.27.20850
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evidence and policy for influenza control

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 31 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…[5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14] However, these trials were under-powered to assess NAI impact on secondary outcomes such as hospitalizations. [15][16][17] Two meta-analyses of the extant clinical trial data, examining outcomes based on the intention-to-treat-influenza infected (ITTI) approach, found that early NAI treatment (≤48 h of symptom onset) was associated with a risk reduction of 59 18 and 63% 19 for hospital admission in otherwise healthy patients with influenza. Other meta-analyses of trial data that evaluated all outpatients with influenza-like-illness (ILI) using the intention-to-treat (ITT) approach did not find a reduction in hospitalizations in those treated with NAIs.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14] However, these trials were under-powered to assess NAI impact on secondary outcomes such as hospitalizations. [15][16][17] Two meta-analyses of the extant clinical trial data, examining outcomes based on the intention-to-treat-influenza infected (ITTI) approach, found that early NAI treatment (≤48 h of symptom onset) was associated with a risk reduction of 59 18 and 63% 19 for hospital admission in otherwise healthy patients with influenza. Other meta-analyses of trial data that evaluated all outpatients with influenza-like-illness (ILI) using the intention-to-treat (ITT) approach did not find a reduction in hospitalizations in those treated with NAIs.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%