2015
DOI: 10.1111/jebm.12134
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evidence Aid approach to gap analysis and priority setting of questions for systematic reviews in disasters

Abstract: This article is based on a presentation at the Evidence Aid Symposium, on 20 September 2014, at Hyderabad, India. Ten years after the Indian Ocean Tsunami, Evidence Aid and it parters and other humanitarian stakeholders met to update about Evidence Aid work and discussed it future. The Evidence Aid approach to fill in the gap on the production and use of evidence in disater sector and other humanitarian health emergencies was widely discussed. Iterative approach to prioritise evidence reinforced Evidence Aid p… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 5 publications
(4 reference statements)
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Multiple [41] 2014 LMICs Man-made and natural disasters Natural disaster, industrial disaster, chemical/biological/radiological/nuclear, conflict, terrorism, civil disturbance, outbreaks, epidemics, pandemics, major transport accidents, generic, multiple, other [42] 2014 India Natural hazard Earthquakes, drought, cyclone, tsunami [43] 2015 Southeast Asia Natural hazard Tsunami [44] 2015 India Natural hazard Flu pandemic [45] 2015 Southeast Asia Natural hazard Tsunami [46] 2015 Pakistan & Haiti Natural hazard Floods, earthquake [47] 2015 Zimbabwe Natural hazard droughts [48] 2015 LMICs Man-made hazard Tsunami, refugee crisis [49] 2015 South Africa Natural hazard Floods, wildfires, droughts, storm waves [50] 2016 East Africa Man-made and natural disasters Conflict, draught, famine, internally displaced person, and refugee crisis [51] 2016 Nepal Natural hazard Lightning strikes, floods, earthquakes and landslides [52] 2016 South Africa Natural hazard Floods, droughts, storm waves and wildfires [53] 2016 LMICs Man-made hazard Fragile and conflict-affected states [54] 2017 LMICs Man-made and natural hazards Armed conflicts and natural disasters [1] 2017 LMICs Man-made hazard Fragile and conflict-affected states [55] options and address implementation considerations. Second, decision-makers need research evidence presented to them alongside other factors that influence their decisions (e.g.…”
Section: Strategies Facilitators and Barriers In Each Section Of Thementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Multiple [41] 2014 LMICs Man-made and natural disasters Natural disaster, industrial disaster, chemical/biological/radiological/nuclear, conflict, terrorism, civil disturbance, outbreaks, epidemics, pandemics, major transport accidents, generic, multiple, other [42] 2014 India Natural hazard Earthquakes, drought, cyclone, tsunami [43] 2015 Southeast Asia Natural hazard Tsunami [44] 2015 India Natural hazard Flu pandemic [45] 2015 Southeast Asia Natural hazard Tsunami [46] 2015 Pakistan & Haiti Natural hazard Floods, earthquake [47] 2015 Zimbabwe Natural hazard droughts [48] 2015 LMICs Man-made hazard Tsunami, refugee crisis [49] 2015 South Africa Natural hazard Floods, wildfires, droughts, storm waves [50] 2016 East Africa Man-made and natural disasters Conflict, draught, famine, internally displaced person, and refugee crisis [51] 2016 Nepal Natural hazard Lightning strikes, floods, earthquakes and landslides [52] 2016 South Africa Natural hazard Floods, droughts, storm waves and wildfires [53] 2016 LMICs Man-made hazard Fragile and conflict-affected states [54] 2017 LMICs Man-made and natural hazards Armed conflicts and natural disasters [1] 2017 LMICs Man-made hazard Fragile and conflict-affected states [55] options and address implementation considerations. Second, decision-makers need research evidence presented to them alongside other factors that influence their decisions (e.g.…”
Section: Strategies Facilitators and Barriers In Each Section Of Thementioning
confidence: 99%