1993
DOI: 10.1016/0022-3999(93)90034-d
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evidence against multiple premenstrual syndromes: results of a multivariate profile analysis of premenstrual symptomatology

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

1998
1998
2001
2001

Publication Types

Select...
2
2
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This was reflected in the report of Gise et al (1990) that only 37% of their sample were compliant in filling out daily assessments over a two-month period. Thus, as suggested by Jorgensen et al (1993), it could be that the motivated, adherent subjects who persist in keeping daily records are not representative of the larger community of women. Finally, daily assessment procedures can be overly time consuming (van der Ploeg & Lodder, 1993) and, can lead to restrictions on the number of symptoms sampled (Yuk et al, 1990).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…This was reflected in the report of Gise et al (1990) that only 37% of their sample were compliant in filling out daily assessments over a two-month period. Thus, as suggested by Jorgensen et al (1993), it could be that the motivated, adherent subjects who persist in keeping daily records are not representative of the larger community of women. Finally, daily assessment procedures can be overly time consuming (van der Ploeg & Lodder, 1993) and, can lead to restrictions on the number of symptoms sampled (Yuk et al, 1990).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…Futterman et al (1988) found that severity of symptoms was "a matter of degree rather than type" in a sample of 878 generally recruited women (p. 19). In a similar study of 1,305 university women, investigators found that symptom-severity profiles of 10 symptoms increased continuously as a function of a total PMS score (Jorgenson, Rossignol, & Bonnlander, 1993). Sanders, Warner, Backmom, and Aancroft (1983) examined daily ratings from three groups of women (n = 55): participants seen in clinic with PMS symptoms (clinic PMS+), participants not seen in clinic with PMS symptoms (non-clinic PMS+), and participants not seen in clinic without PMS symptoms (nonclinic PMS-).…”
Section: Is Pms Simply An Endocrine Disorder?mentioning
confidence: 91%