2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.blre.2018.08.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Everything the clinician needs to know about evidence-based anticoagulation in pregnancy

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
43
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(43 citation statements)
references
References 162 publications
0
43
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, no clear evidence-based recommendation exists yet to clarify whether the woman's daughter should be tested in the future in case of combined oral contraceptive prescription or in case of desire for pregnancy. 20 Of note, the major limitation of this case report is that blood collection was not repeated while the proband was taking a combined oral contraceptive to assert the reproducibility of the measure. However, the biological reproducibility of the assay as well as the analytical reproducibility of ST Genesia in our laboratory is very good (see Table S3), the thrombin generation results were coherent with the presence of a combined oral contraceptive and factor V Leiden mutation, and no potential influencing factor (particularly no other medication and no recent infection) could be identified.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, no clear evidence-based recommendation exists yet to clarify whether the woman's daughter should be tested in the future in case of combined oral contraceptive prescription or in case of desire for pregnancy. 20 Of note, the major limitation of this case report is that blood collection was not repeated while the proband was taking a combined oral contraceptive to assert the reproducibility of the measure. However, the biological reproducibility of the assay as well as the analytical reproducibility of ST Genesia in our laboratory is very good (see Table S3), the thrombin generation results were coherent with the presence of a combined oral contraceptive and factor V Leiden mutation, and no potential influencing factor (particularly no other medication and no recent infection) could be identified.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Testing for factor V Leiden in her young children was not advised because of the absence of immediate consequences. However, no clear evidence‐based recommendation exists yet to clarify whether the woman’s daughter should be tested in the future in case of combined oral contraceptive prescription or in case of desire for pregnancy …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One approach has been to grade the different types of thrombophilia as severe, intermediate or minor types, and to look at events in other family members with the same thrombophilic abnormality. Table 3 [13,14] summarises the recommendations by various authors. It is imperative that the total patient 'package' must be evaluated, e.g.…”
Section: Does the Patient Have A Family History (First Degree) Of Thrmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Treatment with anticoagulants may increase the risk of bleeding in pregnancy or around delivery. Furthermore, it is burdensome, requires daily subcutaneous injections and often causes delayed-type hypersensitivity skin reactions, itching and/or bruises [13,14]. Therefore, evidence to justify anticoagulants for women with inherited thrombophilia and recurrent miscarriage is urgently required.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%