2010
DOI: 10.1007/s10814-010-9039-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Everything Old Is New Again: Recent Approaches to Research on the Archaic Period in the Western United States

Abstract: There are regional differences in how archaeologists conduct their research on the Archaic period. The rich array of techniques and approaches used to examine this period in the West include human behavioral ecology and other evolutionary perspectives, technological style and aspects of practice theory, neuropsychological theory, and more. Recent research in the Great Basin, Southwest, Great Plains, Columbia-Fraser Plateau, and coastal California is surveyed to highlight commonalities and differences in the qu… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 97 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although maize arrived in the Southwest before 2100 BC, archaeologists debate whether maize was incorporated into the existing hunter-gatherer economy with a minimal impact (Minnis 1992; Wills 1995) or a moderate impact (Diehl and Waters 2006) or quickly became a dietary staple (Coltrain, Janetski, and Carlyle 2007; Hard et al 2008). Despite the disagreement, paleoethnobotanists concur that early maize varieties were not as productive as those grown later in the prehispanic era (Adams 1994; Diehl 2005a; Huckell 2006), and recent research suggests that maize was quickly and intensively adopted by some groups but only casually adopted by others (McBrinn 2010:303–306; Roth 2016). The Las Capas site contains the most thoroughly documented preceramic evidence of increasing investment in maize cultivation in the Southwest.…”
Section: The Las Capas Site In a Regional Contextmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although maize arrived in the Southwest before 2100 BC, archaeologists debate whether maize was incorporated into the existing hunter-gatherer economy with a minimal impact (Minnis 1992; Wills 1995) or a moderate impact (Diehl and Waters 2006) or quickly became a dietary staple (Coltrain, Janetski, and Carlyle 2007; Hard et al 2008). Despite the disagreement, paleoethnobotanists concur that early maize varieties were not as productive as those grown later in the prehispanic era (Adams 1994; Diehl 2005a; Huckell 2006), and recent research suggests that maize was quickly and intensively adopted by some groups but only casually adopted by others (McBrinn 2010:303–306; Roth 2016). The Las Capas site contains the most thoroughly documented preceramic evidence of increasing investment in maize cultivation in the Southwest.…”
Section: The Las Capas Site In a Regional Contextmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This means that they had fixed places in the landscape that they moved between and returned to annually or over the course of several years. They would be stationary at a given location for one or more seasons depending on factors like resource availability, other groups in the area, and cultural or ceremonial needs (McBrinn, 2010; Vierra, 2013). They needed to have long term risk management strategies in place to remain resilient in the face of changing climates that impacted those factors.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Archaic Period landscape was populated by nomadic and semi-nomadic foragers who exploited a broad range of plants and animals. The Late Archaic marks the emergence of new technologies and subsistence patterns demonstrating complex land management strategies that are considered foundational in the development of agricultural societies throughout the region [ 36 , 40 – 42 ]. Vierra and Ford have suggested low level cultivation of wild plants and imported cultigens around cave sites [ 19 ].…”
Section: Study Area and Resourcesmentioning
confidence: 99%