2001
DOI: 10.1300/j059v11n02_02
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Everyday Practices of Race, Class and Gender

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
(17 reference statements)
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although an option, whistle blowing as a result of organisational-professional conflict is chronically under researched (Mansbach & Bachner, 2008). A much smaller number of studies identify a third reaction to conflict, reporting on social workers who stay and resist (Abramovitz, 2005;Aronson & Smith, 2009;Baines, 2001;McAuliffe, 2005;McDonald & Chenoweth, 2009;Postle, 2001). Reports from social workers who actively resist when faced with organisational-professional conflict identify a range of micro activities including, acting in opposition to organisational directives, looking the other way when client's did not comply with directives, 'creatively' filling out forms, over stating a client problem to promote their access to services, being 'flexible' with rules and laws, refusing to carry out directives, expanding entitlements for clients who do not officially meet eligibility for services, 'turning a blind eye' when workers evaded directives from management and case by case 'rule bending' (Abramovitz, 2005;Aronson & Smith, 2009;Baines, 2001;McDonald & Chenoweth, 2009).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although an option, whistle blowing as a result of organisational-professional conflict is chronically under researched (Mansbach & Bachner, 2008). A much smaller number of studies identify a third reaction to conflict, reporting on social workers who stay and resist (Abramovitz, 2005;Aronson & Smith, 2009;Baines, 2001;McAuliffe, 2005;McDonald & Chenoweth, 2009;Postle, 2001). Reports from social workers who actively resist when faced with organisational-professional conflict identify a range of micro activities including, acting in opposition to organisational directives, looking the other way when client's did not comply with directives, 'creatively' filling out forms, over stating a client problem to promote their access to services, being 'flexible' with rules and laws, refusing to carry out directives, expanding entitlements for clients who do not officially meet eligibility for services, 'turning a blind eye' when workers evaded directives from management and case by case 'rule bending' (Abramovitz, 2005;Aronson & Smith, 2009;Baines, 2001;McDonald & Chenoweth, 2009).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The critical perspective has been the primary lens to analyze privilege in social work literature and its contribution needs to be acknowledged (Baines, 2000;Dominelli, 2002;Ferber, 2003;Mullaly, 2010). Based on Marxist ideology, proponents of the critical perspective examine power relations and the structure of inequality in society that gives rise to privilege and oppression as a dialectic phenomenon (Dominelli, 2002;Mullaly, 2010).…”
Section: Critical Perspective Versus Social Constructionismmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The composition of the facilitating team was important with respect to representations of oppressive power in the form of 'race', class, and gender, given the ongoing nature of Coloniality(Baines, 2001;Roy et al, 2013; Ngounou and Guiterrez, 2019). It was critical to use facilitators who were reflective, critical and engaged in work with Decoloniality, racism and sexism(Kishimoto, 2018).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%