2021
DOI: 10.1080/13621025.2021.1968715
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Everyday discourse as a space of citizenship: the linguistic construction of in-groups and out-groups in online discussion boards

Abstract: In this paper, we analyze online discussion threads related to national belonging in Finland, Denmark, and France. These discussions are all related to immigration and the definition of 'legitimate' citizens. Our approach is empirical: the goal is to show how ingroups and out-groups are construed linguistically and discursively in the data and how the interactants negotiate membership categories and express their opinions regarding them. The most important in-group in the datasets consists of the nationals bor… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
1
0
1

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
0
1
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…It is within mundane discourses, like the ones apparent on the Suomi24 discussion forum, that this meaning is mobilized for the construction of spatially embedded social identities (cf. Määttä et al 2021). Comments about Helsinki and Hesa dwellers serve to distinguish 'us' (people living outside of the capital region) from 'them' (people living in Helsinki) and, simultaneously, to gain ownership of some of the meanings associated with the capital city.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is within mundane discourses, like the ones apparent on the Suomi24 discussion forum, that this meaning is mobilized for the construction of spatially embedded social identities (cf. Määttä et al 2021). Comments about Helsinki and Hesa dwellers serve to distinguish 'us' (people living outside of the capital region) from 'them' (people living in Helsinki) and, simultaneously, to gain ownership of some of the meanings associated with the capital city.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Kirjoittajien nimimerkkejä ei ole otettu mukaan analyysiin tilanpuutteen takia. Analysoidut esimerkit ovat irrallisia; keskustelujen tarkempia piirteitä ja konteksteja on selitetty tarkemmin aiemmin laadituissa kirjoituksissa (Määttä, Suomalainen & Tuomarla 2020, 2021Määttä 2023).…”
Section: Maahanmuuttoa Koskevien Verkkokeskustelujen Arkidiskurssi Ja...unclassified