Abstract:This paper offers a theoretical agenda for a labourist analysis of screenwriting, and critically evaluates the marginal status of screenwriting within film production systems. On the one hand, screenwriting offers an exemplary case study of creative work in post-modernized film production
industries, work characterized by freelancing and multivalent working patterns, insecurity and hierarchization. Investigating screenwriting as creative labour also offers unique insights into an intensely industrial vocation… Show more
“…Even in science, a domain traditionally associated with the image of lone geniuses, current literature tries to correct an individualistic bias and points to the collective efforts required by all great discoveries (see Collins, ). Scriptwriting, on the other hand, has been considered more consistently as a social type of practice (Conor, ), a practice born out of conversations with a series of others (Redvall, ). Finally, music composition is an equally socially embedded type of activity, especially in its improvisational forms; among them, jazz improvised performances have received considerable attention in recent decades (Sawyer, ).…”
Since its inception, the psychology of creativity has been concerned primarily with the study of individual creators. In contrast, this research is dedicated to an exploration of (a) who has a significant impact on a creative professional's activity and (b) what the contribution is that others make to creative outcomes. The research included interviews with 60 professionals working in science and creative industries in France. The following categories of others emerged: family and friends, peers and students, clients and funders, critics and gatekeepers, and the general public -and they were related to themes depicting the interaction between these different others and the creator. Findings reveal both similarities and differences across the five domains in terms of the specific contribution of others to the creative process. Social interactions play a key formative, regulatory, motivational and informational role in relation to creative work. From 'internalized' to 'distant', other people are an integral part of the equation of creativity calling for a de-centring of the creative self and its re-centring in a social space of actions and interactions.
“…Even in science, a domain traditionally associated with the image of lone geniuses, current literature tries to correct an individualistic bias and points to the collective efforts required by all great discoveries (see Collins, ). Scriptwriting, on the other hand, has been considered more consistently as a social type of practice (Conor, ), a practice born out of conversations with a series of others (Redvall, ). Finally, music composition is an equally socially embedded type of activity, especially in its improvisational forms; among them, jazz improvised performances have received considerable attention in recent decades (Sawyer, ).…”
Since its inception, the psychology of creativity has been concerned primarily with the study of individual creators. In contrast, this research is dedicated to an exploration of (a) who has a significant impact on a creative professional's activity and (b) what the contribution is that others make to creative outcomes. The research included interviews with 60 professionals working in science and creative industries in France. The following categories of others emerged: family and friends, peers and students, clients and funders, critics and gatekeepers, and the general public -and they were related to themes depicting the interaction between these different others and the creator. Findings reveal both similarities and differences across the five domains in terms of the specific contribution of others to the creative process. Social interactions play a key formative, regulatory, motivational and informational role in relation to creative work. From 'internalized' to 'distant', other people are an integral part of the equation of creativity calling for a de-centring of the creative self and its re-centring in a social space of actions and interactions.
“…Screenwriters' activity has been theorized from a multitude of perspectives from sociology, economy, and labor (Blair, 2001;Conor, 2010), to critical theory and gender studies (Cox, 2005;Kohn, 2000). Only a few volumes have been published based on interviews with celebrated screenwriters (e.g., Engel, 2002;Ferguson, 2004Ferguson, , 2009Ferguson, , 2014Katz, 2000); others include personal reflections on one's own activity in the film industry (e.g., Goldman, 1996).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Only a few volumes have been published based on interviews with celebrated screenwriters (e.g., Engel, 2002;Ferguson, 2004Ferguson, , 2009Ferguson, , 2014Katz, 2000); others include personal reflections on one's own activity in the film industry (e.g., Goldman, 1996). The scarcity of studies is probably symptomatic of the marginalization of screenplay writers within a highly hierarchical film industry (Conor, 2010;Pritzer & McGarva, 2009).…”
The present article aims to address a current gap in our understanding of creativity in screenplay writing by focusing on the cognitive, conative, affective, and environmental factors that come into play at different stages in the creative process. It reports a study employing in-depth interviews with 22 recognized French screenplay writers. The findings reveal a series of distinct but interrelated stages in screenplay writing, starting, in general, from a long and enjoyable phase of impregnation, followed in some, but not all cases, by a formal phase of structuring (writing an outline and or treatment), and, finally, intense periods of writing and rewriting the script. These 3 stages, and, in particular, the multiple and concrete decisions to be taken within each one of them, support a vision of the creative process in this domain metaphorically conceptualized as crossing a maze. Creators prepare for this "journey," create "maps," and then enter the maze navigating through various true path segments and blind alleys. This maze is seldom traveled alone, the followed path is not linear, and there are several back-and-forth movements before reaching the "exit," which is represented by the "final" version of the script. These findings are discussed using central ideas from a number of theories, and ideas for future research are proposed.
“…Some research has focused on the labour market, prerequisites for film workers and film work (cf. DeFillippi and Arthur, 1998;Blair et al, 1999;Blair, 2001;Bechky, 2006;Jones and DeFillippi, 1996;Conor, 2010), while other researchers have been interested in the importance of the film industry from an economic perspective (De Vany, 2004;Eliashberg et al, 2006) or have focused on management (Cleve, 2000;Soila-Wadman, 2009). The current increasing research interest is probably linked to changes regarding work in general, rapid and radical changes, particularly in the so-called creative industries, but also because the film industry for decades has been organized around the temporary (Bechky, 2006;Conor, 2010).…”
Purpose -The purpose of this study is to contribute knowledge about learning linked to the film industry by investigating how film producers reason about learning for and in the profession. Design/methodology/approach -This study is based on semi-structured interviews with 20 film producers, both university and workplace trained (UWT) and workplace trained (WT). The content analysis is based on the transcribed dialogues. The study is empirical, explorative and qualitative. Findings -The interviewees consider networks to be of utmost importance for gaining entrance to and continuously finding work in the film industry. They also reason about required knowing and what learning practices are available. Although formal education is not advocated by all, it can hold intrinsic value for the individual. Traditions of learning are being scrutinized, and critical reflection is replacing naivety and emotionality. Practical implications -Different aims regarding learning in the formal education system and film industry result in a gap which needs to be bridged to challenge conserving and reproducing patterns of learning. Collaboration is suggested as a solution benefiting both the individual learner and the film industry. The resulting knowledge from this study can thus be used by the formal education system and the film industry when developing forms for collaboration surrounding learners of film production. Originality/value -The focus presented in this paper of learning in and for film production has been sparingly addressed in previous research.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.