Everybody is able to reflect, or aren't they? Evaluating the development of medical professionalism via a longitudinal portfolio mentoring program from a student perspective
Abstract:Introduction:
Reflective competence is fundamental for responsible medical practice and must be systematically incorporated in medical training. To promote this, a longitudinal portfolio-based mentoring program was made mandatory at the Medical Faculty of the University of Tübingen in 2013. This study examines medical students' attitudes toward professional reflection and toward the program in general to draw conclusions about conditions as well as the needs-based design of the program.
… Show more
“…For example, Davis et al [15] and Salah ElDin et al [17] found that while some students appreciated the opportunity for self-reflection and showcasing their work through portfolios, others expressed concerns about the time and effort required to compile and maintain them. Similarly, Schrempf et al [30] and Salah ElDin et al [17] reported that students valued the authentic assessment opportunities provided by portfolios but struggled with understanding the assessment criteria and expectations.…”
Section: Students' Perceptions Towards Portfolio Assessment Practicesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Students' attitudes toward portfolio assessment practices play a crucial role in their acceptance and engagement. Research by Nungari [11], Suwaed [13], and Schrempf et al [30] demonstrated that students' positive attitudes toward portfolio assessment were associated with higher levels of motivation and commitment to learning. Conversely, students with negative attitudes may resist or disengage from the assessment process, impacting the validity and reliability of the assessment outcomes [30].…”
Section: Students' Attitudes Towards Portfolio Assessment Practicesmentioning
This study examined the perceptions of lecturers and students regarding portfolio assessment practices, their overall attitudes towards this assessment method, and the alignment and divergence between their perceptions. Employing a survey research design, the study was conducted at the University of Education, Winneba, in the Central Region of Ghana, involving 52 final-year science education students and five of their lecturers. Students were selected using stratified random sampling, while lecturers were chosen purposefully. Data collection instruments comprised five-point Likert scale questionnaires administered to both groups, ranging from strongly disagree to strongly agree. Descriptive analysis, including mean, frequencies, and percentages, was utilised for data analysis. Results indicated that lecturers generally perceive a clear purpose for portfolio assessment practices (mean score = 4.20) and emphasise integrating them into every educational programme (mean score = 4.40), while students express lower levels of satisfaction with these aspects (mean scores = 2.15, 2.42, respectively). Additionally, lecturers exhibit moderate attitudes towards portfolio assessment (60.0%), while students predominantly demonstrate low attitudes (59.6%). Alignment between lecturers and students is evident in some areas, such as the importance of communicating objectives and providing feedback to students and the importance of this assessment in diagnosing students’ strengths and weaknesses, but discrepancies arise regarding the guidance of students during the practices. The study concluded that understanding and addressing the differences in perceptions and attitudes between lecturers and students is crucial for promoting a shared understanding and acceptance of portfolio assessment practices. In order to close gaps and foster meaningful engagement, it is then recommended that institutions prioritise efforts to improve communication, collaboration, and support for both lecturers and students to enhance the effectiveness of portfolio assessment practices in higher education.
“…For example, Davis et al [15] and Salah ElDin et al [17] found that while some students appreciated the opportunity for self-reflection and showcasing their work through portfolios, others expressed concerns about the time and effort required to compile and maintain them. Similarly, Schrempf et al [30] and Salah ElDin et al [17] reported that students valued the authentic assessment opportunities provided by portfolios but struggled with understanding the assessment criteria and expectations.…”
Section: Students' Perceptions Towards Portfolio Assessment Practicesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Students' attitudes toward portfolio assessment practices play a crucial role in their acceptance and engagement. Research by Nungari [11], Suwaed [13], and Schrempf et al [30] demonstrated that students' positive attitudes toward portfolio assessment were associated with higher levels of motivation and commitment to learning. Conversely, students with negative attitudes may resist or disengage from the assessment process, impacting the validity and reliability of the assessment outcomes [30].…”
Section: Students' Attitudes Towards Portfolio Assessment Practicesmentioning
This study examined the perceptions of lecturers and students regarding portfolio assessment practices, their overall attitudes towards this assessment method, and the alignment and divergence between their perceptions. Employing a survey research design, the study was conducted at the University of Education, Winneba, in the Central Region of Ghana, involving 52 final-year science education students and five of their lecturers. Students were selected using stratified random sampling, while lecturers were chosen purposefully. Data collection instruments comprised five-point Likert scale questionnaires administered to both groups, ranging from strongly disagree to strongly agree. Descriptive analysis, including mean, frequencies, and percentages, was utilised for data analysis. Results indicated that lecturers generally perceive a clear purpose for portfolio assessment practices (mean score = 4.20) and emphasise integrating them into every educational programme (mean score = 4.40), while students express lower levels of satisfaction with these aspects (mean scores = 2.15, 2.42, respectively). Additionally, lecturers exhibit moderate attitudes towards portfolio assessment (60.0%), while students predominantly demonstrate low attitudes (59.6%). Alignment between lecturers and students is evident in some areas, such as the importance of communicating objectives and providing feedback to students and the importance of this assessment in diagnosing students’ strengths and weaknesses, but discrepancies arise regarding the guidance of students during the practices. The study concluded that understanding and addressing the differences in perceptions and attitudes between lecturers and students is crucial for promoting a shared understanding and acceptance of portfolio assessment practices. In order to close gaps and foster meaningful engagement, it is then recommended that institutions prioritise efforts to improve communication, collaboration, and support for both lecturers and students to enhance the effectiveness of portfolio assessment practices in higher education.
“…This issue discusses a number of topics that may deserve a place in teacher training programs. Schrempf et al [ 10 ] describe the relevance of mentoring and guiding students in reflecting on their competence development. It may also be relevant if teachers recognise when students are using intuitive concepts, as described in the article by Harendza & Herzog [ 11 ].…”
“…In view of the current National Competence-Based Learning Objectives Catalogue (NKLM), describing competencies and learning objectives as a guideline for German faculties and therewith for curriculum development, competency-based medical education (CBME) has become a main approach in medical education and teaching methods [ 14 , 15 ]. Because self-reflection is described within the NKLM as an integrative part of the medical curricula, recently, Schrempf et al presented approaches concerning how to integrate this fundamental and important tool within the educational practice [ 16 ].…”
Objectives: Accurate self-assessment and -reflection of competencies are crucial skills for all health professions. The National Competence-Based Learning Objectives Catalogue (NKLM) guiding medical faculties in Germany points out reflection as a non-technical skill and competency-based medical education (CBME) as important approaches. In this context, the role and structure of curricula and skills labs evolved. Especially in peer-assisted trainings, reflection of competencies is important to improve self-regulated learning. Traditionally, we assume self-reflection skills to evolve automatically with learners’ experience. This approach aims to find empirical evidence for this assumption and implements self-reflection of competencies in clinical skills education. Here, we quantify the influence of age and semester of study and its interaction on the concordant self-reflection of students’ own competencies. Methods: Investigation was based on a retrospective analysis of evaluation data from peer-assisted “first aid” and “physical examination” courses in the skills labs of the medical faculty at the Ruhr-University Bochum, Germany. Participants were asked for self-assessed competencies before (pre) and after (post) the course. Additionally, they were asked to retrospectively re-rate their “before” competencies after completing the course (post-pre). Differences between pre and post-pre competencies were assessed as the concordant self-reflection in a moderated regression analysis. Group means and standard deviation were depicted using univariate analysis of variance (ANOVA) with post-hoc Tukey HSD testing in IBM SPSS Statistics V.28. Moderated regression and simple slope analyses were conducted to calculate interaction effects of age and semester of study on the concordant self-reflection. Results: As expected, participants (n = 168) showed significant progress in subjective self-assessment (pre vs. post) in all 18 assessed domains in the course (all p < 0.001). Additionally, participants self-assessed their previous competencies after the course (post-pre) differently than before the course (pre) in 11 out of 18 domains. Hereby, the interaction of age and semester of study explained a significant part of variance in the first aid course (∆R2 = 0.008, ∆F (1;1020) = 8.53, p < 0.005) and in the physical examination course (ΔR2 = 0.03, ΔF (1;10,280) = 10.72, p < 0.001). Conclusions: We quantified that interaction of age and semester has a significant influence on concordant self-reflection skills using a moderated regression analysis. Assumed as an indicator, we conclude that advanced and older students show less differences in pre- vs. post-pre-ratings. This has implications for curriculum development, postulating that an exposure to self-reflection as a metacognitive process should be introduced early in order to train competencies in health professionals. Prospective studies with competency-based assessments are necessary to validate findings.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.