Abstract:The massive cultural transformation in the pandemic-paused tourism industry has revamped loyalty towards destinations, thus prompting scholarly attention towards global expats who were rarely considered in tourism research. Drawing on data from 266 expats in South Korea, the study examined the effects of country image (CYI), destination image (DNI), and expat's cultural intelligence (ECLI) on expat's renewed destination loyalty (EDLY) in COVID-19 tourism. Using partial least squares structural modeling (PLS-SE… Show more
“…In order to address this contentious issue, the present study empirically highlighted that promoting destinations as pandemic-free can trigger future tourism demand, especially for those who have already received their vaccination shots. The pandemic has distressed many nations with extremely challenging economic, social and cultural conditions, leaving too many people emotionally damaged [134][135][136]. Once acknowledged as a social currency, global travel now incites feelings of shame for those who still want to travel during the pandemic [23].…”
Vaxication (i.e., post-vaccination travel) and branding destinations for COVID-19 safety have emerged as the cornerstones to fully rebound global tourism. Numerous destination brands are now stimulating tourism demand through realigned travel incentives specifically for fully vaccinated travelers. However, there is growing fear and incidents of travel shaming across destinations, especially due to the recent outbreaks of the highly contagious COVID-19 ‘delta and omicron’ variants. Addressing this critical research gap, the present study makes pioneering efforts to empirically examine the effects of COVID-19 branded destination safety (CBDS) on vaxication intentions, under the moderating influence of travel shaming and travel incentives. Drawing on study data from 560 fully-vaccinated residents from Hawaii, United States and structural equation modeling (SEM) with Mplus, the evidence suggests that the positive impact of CBDS on vaxication intention can be further strengthened by travel incentives, or weakened when travel shaming picks up more momentum. Besides the validation of newly developed scales, the study offers strategic insights based on dominant theories (e.g., theory of planned behavior and protection motivation theory) to interpret the changing tourism demand, and to transform the emerging challenges into opportunities through and beyond the pandemic.
“…In order to address this contentious issue, the present study empirically highlighted that promoting destinations as pandemic-free can trigger future tourism demand, especially for those who have already received their vaccination shots. The pandemic has distressed many nations with extremely challenging economic, social and cultural conditions, leaving too many people emotionally damaged [134][135][136]. Once acknowledged as a social currency, global travel now incites feelings of shame for those who still want to travel during the pandemic [23].…”
Vaxication (i.e., post-vaccination travel) and branding destinations for COVID-19 safety have emerged as the cornerstones to fully rebound global tourism. Numerous destination brands are now stimulating tourism demand through realigned travel incentives specifically for fully vaccinated travelers. However, there is growing fear and incidents of travel shaming across destinations, especially due to the recent outbreaks of the highly contagious COVID-19 ‘delta and omicron’ variants. Addressing this critical research gap, the present study makes pioneering efforts to empirically examine the effects of COVID-19 branded destination safety (CBDS) on vaxication intentions, under the moderating influence of travel shaming and travel incentives. Drawing on study data from 560 fully-vaccinated residents from Hawaii, United States and structural equation modeling (SEM) with Mplus, the evidence suggests that the positive impact of CBDS on vaxication intention can be further strengthened by travel incentives, or weakened when travel shaming picks up more momentum. Besides the validation of newly developed scales, the study offers strategic insights based on dominant theories (e.g., theory of planned behavior and protection motivation theory) to interpret the changing tourism demand, and to transform the emerging challenges into opportunities through and beyond the pandemic.
“…There are few advantages of using PLS-SEM, including the ability to analyzing formative indicators and possessing better statistical power (Hair et al , 2017). This study used PLS-SEM on the account that it provides better predictability and allows the examination of more complex model that includes mediation and moderation effect (Zaman et al , 2021). The data quality was checked in the previous section, which can ensure the reliability and both convergent and divergent validity.…”
Purpose
This study aims to understand tourists’ travel intention during the COVID-19 pandemic by using the theory of planned behavior (TPB) with additional causal links and moderators. The three research objectives of this study are to explore basic causality, mediating effects of attitude and moderating effects of age and perceived risk, of the extended TPB model, respectively.
Design/methodology/approach
An online survey was conducted in Taiwan during the COVID-19 pandemic. In total, the survey generated 351 responses. The structural model analysis was performed to test the cause-and-effect relationships in the traditional TPB model and the mediating role of an individual’s attitude regarding travel during the COVID-19 pandemic. The SmartPLS multi-group analysis procedure was applied to test the moderation effects of age and perceived risk.
Findings
It is found that the perceived behavioral control is the main contributor of travel intention for the traditional TPB while attitude partially mediates the relationship between subjective norm and travel intention for the test of mediation. Also, moderation tests confirm that both age and perceived risk show significant moderating effect only on subjective norm to travel intention relationship.
Originality/value
The novelty of this research is that this study proposed and verified the mediating influence of attitude and two additional paths, the moderating influence of age and perceived risk, which deepened the understanding of the TPB model and the impact of COVID-19 on travel intention. Because TPB model is context-dependent, using one mediating and two moderating variables allows the study to understand how TPB functions in a different situation.
“…The present study was aimed at empirically examining a conceptualized model of revenge travel under the influence of pandemic fatigue, COVID-19-branded destination safety, and travel incentives. Due to an unknown (and/or not specifically reported) population of international expats residing in various provinces and cities of Pakistan, as well as the challenge of data collection during times of the COVID-19 pandemic crisis, the present study adopted the recommended approach of non-probability sampling that ensured the cost-effective and timely collection of the study data [11,64]. Using a standardized questionnaire, the study data on international expats were mainly collected through direct emails (i.e., sharing an online survey) to the expat's community, as well as multiple social media platforms (e.g., Facebook, LinkedIn, and WhatsApp, etc.)…”
Section: Sampling and Proceduresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The final sample size (N = 422) showed an exceptional response rate (93.7%) according to the metrics suggested by literature [66]. Importantly, recommended procedures were also adopted during the survey (e.g., ensuring anonymity, confidentiality, and promising feedback to the respondents who had no knowledge about the study's conceptual model, as well as ensuring a simplified survey with easily understandable questions) to overcome any issue of common method bias [11,64].…”
Revenge travel has globally emerged as a dominant touristic behavior, signaling a rapid return of global tourism, but with a greater temptation for spending more and staying longer. Despite the expanding focus on global sustainable tourism, there is a lack of empirical evidence on the potential factors that build momentum for revenge travel. The aim of the present study was to develop and test a conceptualized model of revenge travel under the influence of pandemic fatigue, COVID-19-branded destination safety, and travel stimulus incentives. Drawing on the study data of international expats (N = 422) and using covariance-based structural equation modeling (CB-SEM), the findings provide new evidence that revenge travel is significantly and positively influenced by pandemic fatigue. Interestingly, the empirical findings also support two positive moderations, highlighting that COVID-19-branded destination safety (CBDS) and travel stimulus incentives (TI) can significantly increase the impact of pandemic fatigue (PF) on revenge travel (RT). Based on prominent theories (i.e., theory of planned behavior, protection motivation theory, and incentive theory of motivation) and newly developed scales (i.e., RT, CBDS, and TI), the study highlights the dynamics of revenge travel as it sets the stage for global tourism to rebound stronger than ever. The implications include new challenges and ways forward through revenge travel as a stepping stone for global sustainable tourism.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.