2010
DOI: 10.1080/19331680903473485
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

“Every Little Helps”: Cyber-Campaigning in the 2007 Irish General Election

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
26
0
1

Year Published

2012
2012
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 42 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
0
26
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Empirical research suggests that while this new form of communication may be equally accessible to all candidates standing in an election, those with greater resources and financial capabilities are more likely to successfully utilize these media than candidates with more limited resources (Sudulich & Wall 2010). Thus offline inequalities are reflected in the differences in parties' online strategies.…”
Section: Transformation Of Political Communicationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Empirical research suggests that while this new form of communication may be equally accessible to all candidates standing in an election, those with greater resources and financial capabilities are more likely to successfully utilize these media than candidates with more limited resources (Sudulich & Wall 2010). Thus offline inequalities are reflected in the differences in parties' online strategies.…”
Section: Transformation Of Political Communicationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite this reservation, there is also a strong argument in favor of the claim that the effects on election results can be ascribed to online campaigning. That is, previous studies demonstrated that even the mere online presence of organizations (Kelleher, 2009), political parties (Sudulich & Wall, 2010) and politicians (Kruikemeier, 2014) may result in positive outcomes and even predict election results (such preferential votes). It would be odd to assume that only presence in online media influences voters, and communication style (in this case in interactive style) does not.…”
Section: Conclusion and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Specifically, despite strong claims about the importance of interactive communication tools (mainly in the U.S. context and most notably in Obama's successful presidential campaign), only a few (mostly experimental) studies have demonstrated that higher levels of interactivity in online political campaigning positively affect responses among potential voters (Kruikemeier, 2014;Sundar et al, 2003;Utz, 2009). It was demonstrated that owning a party Web site increased the party's chance of success in an election (Sudulich & Wall, 2010). However, as virtually all local (branches of) Dutch political parties have party Web sites, the mere presence of a Web site becomes irrelevant and the question arises whether differences in Web site content (e.g., interactivity) might explain party success as well.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Irish parties and candidates are now including an online component as part of their campaigning strategies, and research into the online campaigning of Irish parties points to a growing use of the medium (Sudulich & Wall, 2010) although accompanied by a marked reluctance to change 'tried and tested' content. In other words, we might expect that Irish candidates may not take full advantage of the interactivity inherent in social media and may instead continue to use social media as a form of personal press release, primarily to market unmediated campaign messages and reflect the ground campaign.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%