Every fifth published metagenome is not available to science

Abstract

Have you ever sought to use metagenomic DNA sequences reported in scientific publications? Were you successful? Here, we reveal that metagenomes from no fewer than 20% of the papers found in our literature search, published between 2016 and 2019, were not deposited in a repository or were simply inaccessible. The proportion of inaccessible data within the literature has been increasing year-on-year. Noncompliance with Open Data is best predicted by the scientific discipline of the journal. The number of citations, journal type (e.g., Open Access or subscription journals), and publisher are not good predictors of data accessibility. However, many publications in high-impact factor journals do display a higher likelihood of accessible metagenomic data sets. Twenty-first century science demands compliance with the ethical standard of data sharing of metagenomes and DNA sequence data more broadly. Data accessibility must become one of the routine and mandatory components of manuscript submissions-a requirement that should be applicable across the increasing number of disciplines using metagenomics. Compliance must be ensured and reinforced by funders, publishers, editors, reviewers, and, ultimately, the authors. Drivers of open dataScience, as an 'institution of organised criticism' [1], progresses through the act of building on communal knowledge by 'standing on the shoulders of giants'. Information sharing has been PLOS BIOLOGY PLOS Biology | https://doi.

Ignoring social distancing: advances in understanding multi-species bacterial interactions

“…With this new frontier, appropriate data use is critical, and analysis will often need collaboration between subject matter experts, modelers, bioinformaticians, and computer scientists. Omics data can be leveraged not only by the originating lab but also by others, yet one out of every five metagenomic studies since 2016 has not been deposited into a repository 90 . The lack of commitment for open access omics data is stifling progress, and so we want to close by stressing the importance of making raw omics data open access for the betterment of the field.…”

Viral discovery in the ‘realm’ of COVID‐19

“…Coupled with (i) sufficient accessibility to democratized in silico tools, (ii) well-documented data provenance and (iii) well-reported metadata, open access data are an underutilized resource to explore viral diversity in nonmodel hosts. Only 20% of open access metagenomes are accessible, and even this does not imply functionality (Eckert et al, 2020). From this dataset, Nayfach et al (2020) were able to predict putative hosts for >81 000 viral sequences and link multiple viral clades.…”

The reuse of public datasets in the life sciences: potential risks and rewards

“…The statistic that the metagenomes of 20% of papers published between 2016 and 2019 are not publicly accessible (Eckert et al, 2020) demonstrates that there is still a long way to go until data sharing becomes routine. Therefore, open science incentives and database contribution guidelines should require the inclusion of metadata in all submissions to public datasets.…”