1982
DOI: 10.1086/202779
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Events in the Archaeological Context and Archaeological Explanation [with Comments and Replies]

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

1988
1988
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A similar concept is Binford's (1980) distinction of fine-grained and coarse-grained assemblages, with the former reflecting single behavioral events and the latter the result of multiple temporally distinct events. These notions of duration of assemblage formation, where an assemblage is a temporally associated set of artifacts, have a long history in archaeology the gist of which can be summarized by noting that every assemblage is to some greater or lesser degree a palimpsest (Bailey 2007;Brooks 1982). Whether the coarseness or palimpsest nature of an assemblage should be of concern depends on the temporal resolution implicated by the research question asked (e.g., Lyman 2003).…”
Section: -2010mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A similar concept is Binford's (1980) distinction of fine-grained and coarse-grained assemblages, with the former reflecting single behavioral events and the latter the result of multiple temporally distinct events. These notions of duration of assemblage formation, where an assemblage is a temporally associated set of artifacts, have a long history in archaeology the gist of which can be summarized by noting that every assemblage is to some greater or lesser degree a palimpsest (Bailey 2007;Brooks 1982). Whether the coarseness or palimpsest nature of an assemblage should be of concern depends on the temporal resolution implicated by the research question asked (e.g., Lyman 2003).…”
Section: -2010mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is actually difficult to find any detailed or sustained discussion on the nature of archaeological events in the literature, except in relation to another, more dominant concept (see Brooks 1982 for a rare exception; and most recently, Beck et al 2007). Try finding the word in the indices of archaeological theory books and one will be disappointed.…”
Section: Events In Archaeological Discoursementioning
confidence: 99%
“…As such, the meaning of the word 'event' in much contemporary archaeology is unfortunate if not downright misleading. 'Event' is now frequently short-hand for small-scale structures as opposed to medium-and long-term structures; if against the concept of process, it was stripped of any explanatory power, against structure it becomes completely assimilated into the scalar model of time as a generalized concept and has lost almost all sense of particularity (see Brooks 1982 for a very explicit affirmation of this point).…”
Section: Structure and Eventmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The need for historical context is especially acute in areas of the world with short written histories" (Gosden, 1999, p. 11). A realistic conception of the requisite time span for observing human behavior ethnographically or archaeologically depends on the question being asked (Brooks, 1982;Lyman, 2007). Gosden has hit upon one of two key points, but the one he has hit upon is the one others identiWed previously.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%