2019
DOI: 10.4324/9780429202179
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Events: A Metaphysical Study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
15
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…33 Of course, staying put would be a pretty boring action (perhaps not even an action), but it would still qualify as an occurrence of some sort. Following Bennett (1988), § 60, and contra Lombard (1986), I don't see any interesting structural difference between "dynamic" occurrences (i.e., events that involve change) and "static" property instances.…”
Section: Achille Varzimentioning
confidence: 92%
“…33 Of course, staying put would be a pretty boring action (perhaps not even an action), but it would still qualify as an occurrence of some sort. Following Bennett (1988), § 60, and contra Lombard (1986), I don't see any interesting structural difference between "dynamic" occurrences (i.e., events that involve change) and "static" property instances.…”
Section: Achille Varzimentioning
confidence: 92%
“…In this case, event turns out to be a four-dimensional object (Quine, 1960;Goodman, 2012;Bennett, 1988). Lawrence Lombard believes that the ontological basis of an event is change (Lombard, 2019). Boris Hennig divides all "occurrents" into two main types: extended in time and instant.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…But an event that is some completed change or other cannot itself change, on pain of becoming a different change and hence a different event. This is often put by saying that events conform to the doctrine of Mereological Essentialism, meaning that they have their temporal parts essentially (for defenses see, among others, Lombard 1986, Simons 1987, and Neale 1993. 3 It is only if X is (or was) progressing that we can speak of X as having changed at some point while still remaining one and the same X.…”
Section: Onmentioning
confidence: 99%