2017
DOI: 10.1109/tie.2016.2597763
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Event-Triggered Optimal Control for Partially Unknown Constrained-Input Systems via Adaptive Dynamic Programming

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
67
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 182 publications
(72 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
67
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The assumption has been widely used in the literature. 22,33,34 Assumption 3. The augmented optimal control * (x) is locally Lipschitz continuous, ie, there exists a positive constant K such that…”
Section: Event-triggered Robust Controller Design Via Solving the Evementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The assumption has been widely used in the literature. 22,33,34 Assumption 3. The augmented optimal control * (x) is locally Lipschitz continuous, ie, there exists a positive constant K such that…”
Section: Event-triggered Robust Controller Design Via Solving the Evementioning
confidence: 99%
“…These assumptions are common techniques, which are often utilized in the literature for stability analyses. 22,33,[39][40][41][42] G(x) is the augmented control matrix defined as in (7).…”
Section: Stability Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In robot control field, the DRL methods in continuous action spaces can establish the mapping from image inputs to the control policy which are concise [9] [10]. It has many applications in manipulator controling [11], intelligent driving [12] and games [13] [14]. In game decision making, the DRL methods in discrete action spaces, such as AlphaGo [15], show the strong search capability within the high-dimensional decision space.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Such controllers from the field of adaptive control have a longer history of investigating how to achieve a tradeoff between nominal performance as well as learning objectives. One challenge is that numerical algorithms for solving the dual control problem in higher dimensional spaces are often based on approximate dynamic programming, which turn out to be rather computational expensive [21], [38]. There is thus a great need for searching different approximations that can lead to tractable formulations without losing dual features.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%