2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.automatica.2018.10.019
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Event-triggered distributed predictive control for asynchronous coordination of multi-agent systems

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
47
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

5
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 94 publications
(47 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
47
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Let Assumptions 1-6 be valid. Consider that the system (25) with the event-driven optimal control policy ( 13) and the NN observer (26), the observer errorx, the estimated weight errorsW o andṼ o , and the total disturbance compensating error̃o are UUB if the NN weights and the disturbance compensation are updated by: Case 1: When an event is not triggered, for t ∈ [s j − 1 , s j ), we havėŴ…”
Section: Observer Designmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Let Assumptions 1-6 be valid. Consider that the system (25) with the event-driven optimal control policy ( 13) and the NN observer (26), the observer errorx, the estimated weight errorsW o andṼ o , and the total disturbance compensating error̃o are UUB if the NN weights and the disturbance compensation are updated by: Case 1: When an event is not triggered, for t ∈ [s j − 1 , s j ), we havėŴ…”
Section: Observer Designmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In order to reduce communication and computational costs, various event-driven control mechanisms have been proposed. [23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31][32] Unlike in the time-driven control, the sampling of system states in the event-driven control depends on a trigger threshold. Guo et al 23 provided two different event-triggered strategies to solve the problem of feedback control in uncertain nonlinear systems.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To handle the consensus problem, various distributed control strategies have been proposed, including adaptive control [8], sliding mode control (SMC) [3, 6], predictive control [7, 9], robust H control [10], pinning control [11] and so on. In [8], the non‐linear heterogeneous MASs with unknown dynamics achieved robust tracking control by designing adaptive neural networks (NNs) tuning laws.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In [8], the non‐linear heterogeneous MASs with unknown dynamics achieved robust tracking control by designing adaptive neural networks (NNs) tuning laws. To reduce computation and energy consumption, Zou et al [9] designed a dynamic event‐triggering condition and solved the distributed predictive control problem for MASs with bounded disturbances. Li et al .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The NCSs have many merits such as low cost, reduced weight and power, and easy manipulation. Nevertheless, the implementation of communication networks between system components (e.g., sensors, controller and actuators) has largely raised the level of complexities in the analysis and synthesis of the overall NCSs mainly due to the inherent limited bandwidth [14], [29], [32], [42]. It is well recognized that if not properly handled, the network-induced phenomena could cause performance degradation of the overall NCSs.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%