1994
DOI: 10.1109/10.284962
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Event-synchronous cancellation of the heart interference in biomedical signals

Abstract: A two-pass adaptive filtering algorithm is proposed for cancellation of recurrent interferences such as the heart interference in biomedical signals. In the first pass, an average waveform in one period of the interference is estimated by event-synchronous (QRS-synchronous) averaging of the corrupted signal. In a second pass, an adaptive Schur recursive least squares (RLS) lattice filter is used to cancel the interference by using the event synchronously repeated estimated average waveform of the interference … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
43
0
2

Year Published

1996
1996
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
3
3
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 70 publications
(45 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
43
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The data were preprocessed as follows. First, the cardiac artifact was removed by the method of event synchronous subtraction (15). A representative heartbeat from the data was used as a template.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The data were preprocessed as follows. First, the cardiac artifact was removed by the method of event synchronous subtraction (15). A representative heartbeat from the data was used as a template.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Removal of cardiac artefacts poses a different problem, in that the artefacts often appear morphologically different to the recorded ECG signal. To deal with this, Strobach et al (1994) suggested using the ECG reference signal as a trigger to an artificial ECG artefact reference model signal to remove ECG artefact from the EEG using linear regression. When an ECG spike was detected, an ECG artefact signal was generated from a reference model, scaled to the detected ECG signal and was then subtracted from the EEG signal .…”
Section: Filtering and Regressionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The sources corresponding to respiratory artefact must then be identified; to accomplish this, each source is compared with the simultaneously recorded polygraphy signal. However, this comparison is confounded by the fact that, like ECG artefacts, respiratory artefacts can be remarkably different in morphology to those of the signal in the polygraphy measurement (Strobach et al, 1994). To overcome this problem, De Vos et al (2011) propose an intermediary step whereby both EEG and polygraphy sources are transformed in order to enhance the similarity between them.…”
Section: Removing Respiratory Artefact Componentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The first technique is proposed by Widrow et al [7] and extended by Strobach et al [8] and is based on adaptive noise cancellation using an artificial reference signal. This artificial reference signal is built from mECG templates that are generated by averaging several consecutive mECG complexes, synchronized on the QRScomplex.…”
Section: B Reference Techniquesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This artificial reference signal is built from mECG templates that are generated by averaging several consecutive mECG complexes, synchronized on the QRScomplex. This technique is referred to as event-synchronous adaptive interference cancelling (ESAIC) [8].…”
Section: B Reference Techniquesmentioning
confidence: 99%