2006
DOI: 10.1080/15298860600591222
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Event self-importance, event rehearsal, and the fading affect bias in autobiographical memory

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

20
141
3

Year Published

2008
2008
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

5
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 128 publications
(176 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
20
141
3
Order By: Relevance
“…However, the role of rehearsal as a mediator for the three-way interaction is very different in the current study than in the Gibbons et al study, because rehearsal showed a very similar pattern of effects on the FAB as did the interaction on the FAB in their study, whereas the opposite result was found in the current study. This finding extends the work of past researchers who have shown the importance of rehearsal for the FAB (Muir et al, 2014;Ritchie et al, 2006;Skowronski et al, 2004). This result also suggests that future research on the FAB should continue to examine the role of rehearsal as an explanatory mechanism for the effects of event type and individual difference variables on the FAB.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 74%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, the role of rehearsal as a mediator for the three-way interaction is very different in the current study than in the Gibbons et al study, because rehearsal showed a very similar pattern of effects on the FAB as did the interaction on the FAB in their study, whereas the opposite result was found in the current study. This finding extends the work of past researchers who have shown the importance of rehearsal for the FAB (Muir et al, 2014;Ritchie et al, 2006;Skowronski et al, 2004). This result also suggests that future research on the FAB should continue to examine the role of rehearsal as an explanatory mechanism for the effects of event type and individual difference variables on the FAB.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 74%
“…Although this fact restricts the generalizability of these results, future research could rectify this problem by examining large, diverse samples to replicate the findings in the current experiment and extend them to broader populations. The final limitation pertains to the fact that we used a single measure to capture private and public rehearsals, whereas past research has shown that social and private rehearsals take different forms and produce different effects on the FAB (e.g., Ritchie et al, 2006). Although the current study and the Gibbons et al (2013) study showed that rehearsal ratings mediated the combined effect of event type and individual differences on the FAB, future research could obtain separate private and public rehearsals to assess their effect on the FAB across event type and related individual differences.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…First, the FAB has been documented by numerous researchers, and via numerous methodologies, which have tested many parameters of the phenomenon (Gibbons et al, 2011;Holmes, 1970;Ritchie et al, 2006Ritchie et al, , 2009Walker et al, 1997). Regardless of design or measurement nuances, the data clearly identified the source of the FAB to be in ratings of current affect, not the ratings of initial affect (Landau & Gunter, 2009).…”
Section: Context and Methods Considerationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We encourage researchers to employ different research methods to study the FAB; however, while sampling across different cultures it would be prudent to maintain methodological consistency. Memory, epub ahead of print published online:14th February 2014, available online at: http://www.tandfonline.com/10.1080/09658211.2014 Second, this phenomenon has been meaningfully linked to other psychological phenomena, such as current mood (Ritchie, 2006), different types of event rehearsal (Ritchie et al, 2006;, social discourse (Skowronski et al, 2004), flashbulb memory (Bohn & Berntsen, 2007), psychological closure (Beike & Crone, 2008;Ritchie et al, 2006), event imagery (Ritchie & Batteson, 2013), and dreaming (Ritchie & Skowronski, 2008).…”
Section: Context and Methods Considerationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Just as experienced regret is more intense for events for which the self is to blame (Connolly & Zeelenberg, 2002), so too is the fading affect bias smaller for events that are perceived as self-caused (e.g., one's own actions are to blame; Ritchie et al, 2006). Just as life regrets of inaction are more persistent in memory for events that are perceived as open (Savitsky et al, 1997), so too is the fading affect bias smaller for events that are perceived as open (Ritchie et al, 2006).…”
Section: Why Experienced Regret Might Resist the Fading Affect Biasmentioning
confidence: 89%