2023
DOI: 10.1609/aaai.v37i11.26643
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Event Process Typing via Hierarchical Optimal Transport

Abstract: Understanding intention behind event processes in texts is important to many applications. One challenging task in this line is event process typing, which aims to tag the process with one action label and one object label describing the overall action of the process and object the process likely affects respectively. To tackle this task, existing methods mainly rely on the matching of the event process level and label level representation, which ignores two important characteristics: Process Hierarchy and Lab… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 23 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…TOT achieves a trade-off between predicate-wise comparison and triple-wise comparison when computing the optimal transport matrix, in which the significance of the two terms is controlled by the hyperparameter β ∈ [0, 1]. For the marginals of the transport matrix, instead of imposing strict equality constraints (Zhou et al 2023), we add two regularizers to penalize the KL-divergences between them and uniform distributions (Wu et al 2023). The terms 1 I 1 I and 1 J 1 J in Eqn.…”
Section: Multi-prototype Learningmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…TOT achieves a trade-off between predicate-wise comparison and triple-wise comparison when computing the optimal transport matrix, in which the significance of the two terms is controlled by the hyperparameter β ∈ [0, 1]. For the marginals of the transport matrix, instead of imposing strict equality constraints (Zhou et al 2023), we add two regularizers to penalize the KL-divergences between them and uniform distributions (Wu et al 2023). The terms 1 I 1 I and 1 J 1 J in Eqn.…”
Section: Multi-prototype Learningmentioning
confidence: 99%