2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.neucom.2015.02.081
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Event photo mining from Twitter using keyword bursts and image clustering

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 42 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
(27 reference statements)
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For example, Alqhtani et al [13] extract three types of features from images, including Histogram of Oriented Gradients descriptors, Grey-Level Co-occurrence Matrix and color histogram, which are then combined with features extracted from text to train a Support Vector Machine for event detection. In another example, Kaneko and Yanai [11] propose a method to select images from tweet streams for detected events. Specifically, the images are clustered based on densely sampled speeded-up robust features (SURF) and 64-dimensional RGB color histograms.…”
Section: Fusion Of Text and Image For Event Detectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, Alqhtani et al [13] extract three types of features from images, including Histogram of Oriented Gradients descriptors, Grey-Level Co-occurrence Matrix and color histogram, which are then combined with features extracted from text to train a Support Vector Machine for event detection. In another example, Kaneko and Yanai [11] propose a method to select images from tweet streams for detected events. Specifically, the images are clustered based on densely sampled speeded-up robust features (SURF) and 64-dimensional RGB color histograms.…”
Section: Fusion Of Text and Image For Event Detectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Besides, the similarity of the user's feature attribute is another dimension of relationship strength measurement, which is measured based on the posts of the user pair. Distance formulas are widely used in the similarity measurement, such as Euclidean distance, Manhattan distance [36,37], Chebyshev distance [38,39], Minkowski distance [40,41] and so on. Among those models, the squared Euclidean distance calculation is the most popular for practical application, therefore, it is adopted to measure the similarity of the user's feature attribute.…”
Section: Calculation Of Common Friend Rate and The Similarity Of Usermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It considers both the importance of searching results and the relative location of searching results. NDCG is a metric that is widely used to evaluate the relationship strength measurement [34,41,44]. Hence, NDCG is chosen as another evaluation metric for performance comparison, which is defined as follows:…”
Section: Evaluation Metricmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The central location of keywords was estimated for geo‐locating the local event detected. Moreover, both visual and textual information from Twitter were analyzed by Kaneko and Yanai () through adding image clustering with keyword burst detection. The local events detected were shown with representative photos on the map.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%