Proceedings of the ACM SIGMOD Workshop on Databases and Social Networks 2013
DOI: 10.1145/2484702.2484703
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Event identification for local areas using social media streaming data

Abstract: Unprecedented success and active usage of social media services result in massive amounts of user-generated data. An increasing interest in the contained information from social media data leads to more and more sophisticated analysis and visualization applications. Because of the fast pace and distribution of news in social media data it is an appropriate source to identify events in the data and directly display their occurrence to analysts or other users. This paper presents a method for event identificatio… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
46
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 46 publications
(46 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
(10 reference statements)
0
46
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The first technique, log-likelihood ratio (LLH), is a reimplementation of Weiler et al [43], which is realized as a LLH user-defined function that is applied to the grouped set of terms of a time window. In contrast to the original technique that detected events for pre-defined geographical areas, we adjusted the approach to calculate the log-likelihood measure for the frequency of all distinct terms in the current time window against their frequency in the past time windows.…”
Section: Event Detection Approachesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The first technique, log-likelihood ratio (LLH), is a reimplementation of Weiler et al [43], which is realized as a LLH user-defined function that is applied to the grouped set of terms of a time window. In contrast to the original technique that detected events for pre-defined geographical areas, we adjusted the approach to calculate the log-likelihood measure for the frequency of all distinct terms in the current time window against their frequency in the past time windows.…”
Section: Event Detection Approachesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The second technique, Shifty, is a reimplementation of Weiler et al [47]. In contrast to the original paper, which additionally considers bigrams, we now only use single terms in the analysis.…”
Section: Event Detection Approachesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our own Shifty [20] technique calculates a measure that is based on the shift of IDF values of single terms in pairs of successive sliding windows of a pre-defined size. First, the IDF value of each term in a single window (with size s input ) is continuously computed and compared to the average IDF value of all terms within that window.…”
Section: Event Detection Techniquesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, the critical factor is the dependency between these selected features since more than one event may be represented by an identical set of features leading to ambiguity [48]. Moreover, these features are used to differentiate between the events within the same topic, since the variation between these events may be relatively minor [49]. In practice, these features might be either content-based features (e.g., TF-IDF scores, emoticons, number of tags) or non-textual features, called meta-data (e.g., number of comments or friends (Facebook), or number of followers (Twitter)).…”
Section: Feature Extraction Challengesmentioning
confidence: 99%