2019
DOI: 10.1209/0295-5075/126/42001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Event-by-event analysis of maximum pseudo-rapidity gap fluctuation in high-energy nucleus-nucleus collisions

Abstract: PACS No. 25.75.-q 25.75.Ag. 25.75.Gz. 24.60.Ky. Abstract A detailed study of event-by-event maximum pseudo-rapidity gap fluctuations in relativistic heavy-ion collisions in terms of the scaled variance has been carried out for 16 O-AgBr, 28 Si-AgBr and 32 S-AgBr interactions at an incident momentum of 4.5 AGeV/c applying the multiplicity cut (N > . For all the interactions the values of scaled variance are found to be greater than zero indicating the presence of strong fluctuation of maximum rap gap values in … Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 67 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Taking Ag and Br nuclei as target, events were generated separately for each target. According to the proportional abundance of Ag and Br nuclei present in the nuclear emulsion, the generated events were mixed with each other in order to get the desired UrQMD data sample [42]. All the charged mesons produced in the UrQMD simulation were considered for the analysis of event by event fluctuation of maximum particle density.…”
Section: Analysis and Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…Taking Ag and Br nuclei as target, events were generated separately for each target. According to the proportional abundance of Ag and Br nuclei present in the nuclear emulsion, the generated events were mixed with each other in order to get the desired UrQMD data sample [42]. All the charged mesons produced in the UrQMD simulation were considered for the analysis of event by event fluctuation of maximum particle density.…”
Section: Analysis and Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In nuclear emulsion detector sources of systematic errors are the scanning procedure, fading of tracks and the presence of background 10 contaminations. It has been discussed in our earlier papers that total contribution of systematic errors coming out from the scanning procedure, fading of tracks, and presence of background contaminations is around (1-2)% [42,45,52]. It has been discussed in [50] that the shower particles are mostly pions (more than 90%) with a small proportion (less than 10%) of kaons and hyperons among them.…”
Section: Analysis and Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations