2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2016.06.017
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Event-based stormwater management pond runoff temperature model

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
19
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
0
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As an alternative, the extreme learning machine (ELM) calculates optimum weights in a single hidden layer feed-forward artificial neural network [5]. Hence, ELM-ANN differs from the traditional FFBP-ANN method, as the optimum weights in the network are calculated analytically, resulting in high performance capacity and fast training for large data sets [6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18]. However, although having many desirable features, the authors have not identified any application of ELM-ANN to water pipe networks.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As an alternative, the extreme learning machine (ELM) calculates optimum weights in a single hidden layer feed-forward artificial neural network [5]. Hence, ELM-ANN differs from the traditional FFBP-ANN method, as the optimum weights in the network are calculated analytically, resulting in high performance capacity and fast training for large data sets [6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18]. However, although having many desirable features, the authors have not identified any application of ELM-ANN to water pipe networks.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nonetheless, various soft computing methods of modeling complex phenomena have been applied in recent decades. Numerous researchers have used such methods, for instance fuzzy logic, artificial neural networks (ANN), gene expression programming (GEP), neuro‐fuzzy systems, genetic programming and support vector machines (SVM) to solve a variety of hydraulic problems, including open channel bend simulations (Gholami et al, , ), side weir discharge prediction (Dursun et al, ), sediment transport (Thompson et al, ), predicting the longitudinal dispersion coefficient in streams (Najafzadeh and Sattar, ; Sattar and Gharabaghi, ), dam breach parameters (Sattar, ), organic micropollutant removal in soil aquifer treatment systems (Sattar, ), predicting the timing of water main failure (Sattar et al, ), stormwater runoff temperature (Sabouri et al, ) and erosion resistance of cohesive soils (Sattar, ). Intense studies have been done on the application of soft computing methods to simulate engineering problems, with the number of such studies increasing every day.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…By considering the mean error and standard deviation, confidence bound was defined by the predicted values using the Wilson score method without continuity correction. The 95% confidence bound is expressed as ±1.64 S e . The uncertainty analysis results for COD%, H 2 %, and HY are presented in Table .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The 95% confidence bound is expressed as AE1.64 S e . [43,44] The uncertainty analysis results for COD%, H 2 %, and HY are www.advancedsciencenews.com www.clean-journal.com presented in Table 9. The results show that the COD% was overestimated and the other two models underestimated.…”
Section: Uncertainty Analysis For Gep Predictionsmentioning
confidence: 99%