1993
DOI: 10.1103/physrevlett.70.1862
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Even-odd asymmetry of a superconductor revealed by the Coulomb blockade of Andreev reflection

Abstract: We have measured at low temperatures the current through a submicrometer superconducting island connected to two normal metal leads by ultrasmall tunnel junctions. As the bias voltage is lowered well below twice the superconducting energy gap, the current changes from being e periodic with gate charge to 2e periodic. This behavior is clear evidence that there is a difference in the total energy between the ground states of an even and odd number of electrons on the island. The 2e-periodic current peaks are the… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

9
103
2

Year Published

1997
1997
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 147 publications
(118 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
9
103
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Q 0 can of course be determined reasonably accurately by studying the largescale Coulomb oscillations of the I-V curve that occur as functions of V g at fixed V , a procedure that is well-established for mesoscopic SETs, for which indeed it has been possible to measure the ground state energy difference between a superconducting island with an even or odd number of electrons [62,[84][85][86][87][88]. However, a complication arises for the nanoscopic grains of present interest, due to the smallness of their gate capacitances (typically ≃ 0.1 aF): to sweep V g through one Coulomb oscillation, the gate voltage V g must be swept through a range so large (namely e/C g ≃ 1V) that during the sweep, RBT routinely observed small "rigid" shifts of the entire tunneling spectrum at random values of V g .…”
Section: Ground State Energy Differences Are Currently Not Measurablementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Q 0 can of course be determined reasonably accurately by studying the largescale Coulomb oscillations of the I-V curve that occur as functions of V g at fixed V , a procedure that is well-established for mesoscopic SETs, for which indeed it has been possible to measure the ground state energy difference between a superconducting island with an even or odd number of electrons [62,[84][85][86][87][88]. However, a complication arises for the nanoscopic grains of present interest, due to the smallness of their gate capacitances (typically ≃ 0.1 aF): to sweep V g through one Coulomb oscillation, the gate voltage V g must be swept through a range so large (namely e/C g ≃ 1V) that during the sweep, RBT routinely observed small "rigid" shifts of the entire tunneling spectrum at random values of V g .…”
Section: Ground State Energy Differences Are Currently Not Measurablementioning
confidence: 99%
“…A large Coulomb energy E C = e 2 /(2C) compared to the temperature T prevents an extra electron from tunneling in and allows one to manipulate the charge state n of the island in a controllable way by varying the gate voltage V g = en g /C g across the capacitor C g . For an S island this physical picture becomes more complicated due to the electron number parity effect [7][8][9][10]. * Corresponding author: ivan.khaymovich@aalto.fi This effect consists in the 2e-periodic dependence of the observables on V g and thus provides a direct confirmation of the Cooper pair charge quantization.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In general, it coexists with the Cooper pair tunneling and makes junction dynamics irreversible. However, if both the temperature T and charging energy E C of the junctions are much smaller than the superconducting energy gap ∆, the quasiparticle tunneling is suppressed by the parity effects [22][23][24] to a level where it can be negligible on the macroscopic time scales [25,26]. Another dissipation mechanism is coupling to the electromagnetic excitations supported by the system of superconducting electrodes.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%