2010
DOI: 10.1002/mma.1298
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Even homoclinic orbits for super quadratic Hamiltonian systems

Abstract: We study the existence of even homoclinic orbits for the second-order Hamiltonian systemü+V u (t, u) = 0. Let V(t, u) = −K(t, u)+W(t, u) ∈ C 1 (R×R n , R), where K is less quadratic and W is super quadratic in u at infinity. Since the system we considered is neither autonomous nor periodic, the (PS) condition is difficult to check when we use the Mountain Pass theorem. Therefore, we approximate the homoclinic orbits by virtue of the solutions of a sequence of nil-boundary-value problems.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
(13 reference statements)
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It is not until the recent decade that variational principle has been widely used. The existence and multiplicity of homoclinic orbits for the second order Hamiltonian systems have been extensively investigated in many recent papers (see [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16]). The main feature of the problem is the lack of global compactness due to unboundedness of domain.…”
Section: Introduction and Main Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…It is not until the recent decade that variational principle has been widely used. The existence and multiplicity of homoclinic orbits for the second order Hamiltonian systems have been extensively investigated in many recent papers (see [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16]). The main feature of the problem is the lack of global compactness due to unboundedness of domain.…”
Section: Introduction and Main Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some papers treat the coercive case (see [5][6][7][8]). Recently, the symmetric case has been dealt with (see [9][10][11]). Compared with the superquadratic case, the case that ( , ) is subquadratic as | | → +∞ has been considered only by a few authors.…”
Section: Introduction and Main Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%