Proceedings of the Twenty-Eighth Annual ACM-SIAM Symposium on Discrete Algorithms 2017
DOI: 10.1137/1.9781611974782.20
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Even Delta-Matroids and the Complexity of Planar Boolean CSPs

Abstract: The main result of this paper is a generalization of the classical blossom algorithm for finding perfect matchings. Our algorithm can efficiently solve Boolean CSPs where each variable appears in exactly two constraints (we call it edge CSP) and all constraints are even ∆-matroid relations (represented by lists of tuples). As a consequence of this, we settle the complexity classification of planar Boolean CSPs started by Dvořák and Kupec.Knowing that edge CSP is tractable for even ∆-matroid constraints allows … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(2 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For valued constraint language on Boolean domains, we have given a necessary condition for tractability. The obvious open problem is to give a complexity classification of Boolean valued constraint languages, following a classification of crisp Boolean constraint languages [12,26]. Another line of work is to consider larger domains in the non-conservative setting.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For valued constraint language on Boolean domains, we have given a necessary condition for tractability. The obvious open problem is to give a complexity classification of Boolean valued constraint languages, following a classification of crisp Boolean constraint languages [12,26]. Another line of work is to consider larger domains in the non-conservative setting.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Planar restrictions have been studied for Boolean (decision) CSPs [12,26], for Boolean symmetric counting CSPs with real [5] and complex [20] weights, and also for Boolean CSPs with respect to polynomial-time approximation schemes [27,10].…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%