1996
DOI: 10.1006/jcta.1996.0075
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Even and Odd Pairs of Lattice Paths with Multiple Intersections

Abstract: Let M n, k r, s be the number of ordered pairs of paths in the plane, with unit steps E or N, that intersect k times in which the first path ends at the point (r, n&r) and the second path ends at the point (s, n&s). Let

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

1997
1997
2010
2010

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Moreover, we may drop the condition that endpoints do not coincide (as is the case in Theorem 1): Remember that we are dealing with ordered pairs of paths, i.e., every pair ( p, q) of paths p, q, where both paths start at the origin and end in the same point P (and where p{q), is considered different from the``reversed'' pair (q, p). Here, the common endpoint counts as point of intersection (contrary to the definition in [1,2]; pointed out by Sulanke [6]): Corollary 1. Let 0 t v and u w 0; let P=(t, u), Q=(v, w) be two points in the integer lattice Z_Z (P=Q is possible).…”
Section: A Simple Generalizationmentioning
confidence: 94%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Moreover, we may drop the condition that endpoints do not coincide (as is the case in Theorem 1): Remember that we are dealing with ordered pairs of paths, i.e., every pair ( p, q) of paths p, q, where both paths start at the origin and end in the same point P (and where p{q), is considered different from the``reversed'' pair (q, p). Here, the common endpoint counts as point of intersection (contrary to the definition in [1,2]; pointed out by Sulanke [6]): Corollary 1. Let 0 t v and u w 0; let P=(t, u), Q=(v, w) be two points in the integer lattice Z_Z (P=Q is possible).…”
Section: A Simple Generalizationmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…5]. The definition for M n, k r, s in [1,2] differs slightly from the one given above insofar as intersections at the endpoint (if r=s) are also not counted: This difference is irrelevant for the following theorem, but will simplify notation of the subsequent corollary.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 92%
See 2 more Smart Citations