2014
DOI: 10.1111/jcom.12116
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evasive Targets: Deciphering Polysemy in Mediated Humor

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
25
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 39 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
(54 reference statements)
1
25
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This can be considered a form of ‘unstereotypical stereotyping’ (Boxman-Shabtai and Shifman, 2014: 986). Women take up and perpetuate stereotypes about women in science and women in general.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…This can be considered a form of ‘unstereotypical stereotyping’ (Boxman-Shabtai and Shifman, 2014: 986). Women take up and perpetuate stereotypes about women in science and women in general.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our analysis shows that the ironic and humorous ways in which they contributed to the hashtag protest were used to counter the stereotypical and misogynist attributions experienced by women scientists in their working environment, which were verbalized in Hunt’s speech. Humorous tweets used ‘unstereotypical stereotyping’ (Boxman-Shabtai and Shifman, 2014) and, thus, deployed a body politics that exposed and subversively attacked existing gender stereotypes about women in science and social norms and ideas about ‘sexiness’. However, as ‘the original derogatory stereotypes are still embedded’ (Boxman-Shabtai and Shifman, 2014: 992), this humorous strategy of subversion might still come with the risk of being polysemic and open to various readings.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The perpetual embedding and re-embedding of GIFs in new conversations, listicles, and coverage of different topics highlight the content’s malleability as it is repeatedly appropriated. GIFs demonstrate what Boxman-Shabtai and Shifman (2014) describe as “centrifugal multimodality”: the meaning constructed here is based not just on the content of the GIF but also on the surrounding factors (captions, messages, and the like) which provide additional context and layers for interpretation. As Morley (1980) established in regard to televisual texts, audience interpretations are often determined by subjectivity and positionality.…”
Section: Communicative Affordances Of the Gifmentioning
confidence: 87%