2020
DOI: 10.1109/access.2020.2978883
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evasive Maneuver Strategy for UCAV in Beyond-Visual-Range Air Combat Based on Hierarchical Multi-Objective Evolutionary Algorithm

Abstract: This study deals with the autonomous evasive maneuver strategy of unmanned combat air vehicle (UCAV), which is threatened by a high-performance beyond-visual-range (BVR) air-to-air missile (AAM). Considering tactical demands of achieving self-conflicting evasive objectives in actual air combat, including higher miss distance, less energy consumption and longer guidance support time, the evasive maneuver problem in BVR air combat is defined and reformulated into a multi-objective optimization problem. Effective… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…But the process of A consumes much more energy than that of B, because the throttle of A needs to maintain a high thrust. On the other hand, under the same condition of energy consumption, the miss distance obtained by B must be larger than that of A, i.e., md b > md a , as a result of larger air drag for the missile at lower altitudes [6]. Of course, there are also many cases of failed evasion, such as trajectory C in which the BF performs a plane overloading turn and is finally hit by the missile.…”
Section: A Description Of the Problemmentioning
confidence: 97%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…But the process of A consumes much more energy than that of B, because the throttle of A needs to maintain a high thrust. On the other hand, under the same condition of energy consumption, the miss distance obtained by B must be larger than that of A, i.e., md b > md a , as a result of larger air drag for the missile at lower altitudes [6]. Of course, there are also many cases of failed evasion, such as trajectory C in which the BF performs a plane overloading turn and is finally hit by the missile.…”
Section: A Description Of the Problemmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…There is more of an emphasis on the game of space angle. Therefore, a fighter against missiles in a dogfight should use its dynamic advantage over that of the missile to perform a successful evasion rather than planned strategy [5], [6].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The weight of interception probability β ∆S = 0.5, β ∆Tgo = βq = 0.25. The performance parameters of close-range and medium-range weapon are respectively set as our previous work [35] and [36]. In each salvo, The state transition of target follows the Bernoulli distribution about the interception probability [37], which can be calculated by Equation (19).…”
Section: A Operational Scenario and Parameter Settingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many of them use game theory to model air combat [7], [8], [9], [10]. Other approaches found in the literature are as follows: Bayesian Networks [11], [12], [13], [14], fuzzy logic [15], [16], agent-based modeling [17], influence diagrams [18], reinforcement learning [19], [20], [21], [22], artificial neural networks [23], [24], evolutionary algorithms [25], [26], minimax method [27], and behavior trees [28].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%