2016
DOI: 10.17719/jisr.20164622574
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evasion Stratejies Used in Turkish Political Discourse

Abstract: There is a widespread perception that politicians are frequently evasive under questioning from members of the news media (Clayman, 2001: 403). The evasion strategies like ignoring the question, questioning the question or employing humor are one of the most frequently analyzed aspects of the social-psychological literature on political interviews (Gnisci and Bonaiuto, 2003: 387). However, there have not been any studies that focus on the evasion strategies used in Turkish political context. The purpose of the… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 7 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Of course, studies of equivocation in interviews and press conferences extend beyond UK politics. Researchers have examined the practices of politicians worldwide, including, the United States (e.g., Clayman, 2001;Clementson & Eveland, 2016), Malaysia (Nur Zahraa & Siti Rohana, 2016), Montenegro (Vuković, 2013), Taiwan (Huang, 2009), and Turkey (Çakir, Kökpinar Kaya, & Kara, 2016). Such studies, however, either did not set out to evaluate reply rates or, where statistics are reported, they are not always suitable for comparison with the foregoing UK studies.…”
Section: Previous Research -Replies and Evasionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Of course, studies of equivocation in interviews and press conferences extend beyond UK politics. Researchers have examined the practices of politicians worldwide, including, the United States (e.g., Clayman, 2001;Clementson & Eveland, 2016), Malaysia (Nur Zahraa & Siti Rohana, 2016), Montenegro (Vuković, 2013), Taiwan (Huang, 2009), and Turkey (Çakir, Kökpinar Kaya, & Kara, 2016). Such studies, however, either did not set out to evaluate reply rates or, where statistics are reported, they are not always suitable for comparison with the foregoing UK studies.…”
Section: Previous Research -Replies and Evasionmentioning
confidence: 99%