1986
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.83.17.6593
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evasion of alternative complement pathway by Trypanosoma cruzi results from inefficient binding of factor B.

Abstract: During its differentiation in the insect vector to a stage infective for the mammalian host, Trypanosoma cruzi becomes resistant to lysis by the alternative pathway of complement. To elucidate the mechanism of complement evasion, we studied control of complement activation on the surface of the noninfective epimastigote and the infective culture-derived metacyclic trypomastigote stages (CMT) of T. cruzi. It was found that the predominant form of complement component C3 on epimastigotes is C3b, whereas the majo… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
46
0
1

Year Published

1989
1989
2010
2010

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 47 publications
(48 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
1
46
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Trypanosomes are able to activate the alternative complement pathway in blood (35), whereas decreased complement activation was reported during the 1980s in infective cultures of T. cruzi, responsible for Chagas' disease (36). Complement factor H is the principal inhibitor of the alternative pathway, and is also involved in the protection of epithelial, endothelial, and some cancer cells against complement action (37).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Trypanosomes are able to activate the alternative complement pathway in blood (35), whereas decreased complement activation was reported during the 1980s in infective cultures of T. cruzi, responsible for Chagas' disease (36). Complement factor H is the principal inhibitor of the alternative pathway, and is also involved in the protection of epithelial, endothelial, and some cancer cells against complement action (37).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The basis for this difference is the ability of trypomastigotes but not of epimastigotes to N-glycosylate an 87-to 93-kDa surface protein which has DAF-like activity (180,182,325). Although C3b is deposited on both forms, the presence of the glycosylated protein reduces the affinity of C3b for factor B and leads to more rapid C3b decay (181).…”
Section: Microbial Interactions With Complementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Trypomastigotes are refractory to complement-mediated lysis, whereas epimastigotes activate the alternate complement pathway. The mechanism of the resistance of trypomastigotes to complement is unclear, and several different mechanisms have been proposed (104,114,115,235). Amastigotes activate complement but are not lysed.…”
Section: Biochemistry Of Invasionmentioning
confidence: 99%