2012
DOI: 10.1590/s0100-69162012000300017
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evapotranspiration and crop coefficient of drip irrigated watermelon in Piaui coastline, Brazil

Abstract: ABSTRACT:The knowledge of the evapotranspiration (ETc) and crop coefficient (Kc) is fundamental to plan and to manage the irrigation of any crop. The aim of this study was to determine the daily and hourly evapotranspiration of drip irrigated watermelon (Citrullus Lanatus, var. Crimson Sweet)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
6
0
5

Year Published

2016
2016
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
1
6
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…(25.99 cm) and 918.72 m 3 fed -1 (21.87cm) for the irrigation level of I 1, I 2 and I 3 , respectively, in the 1 st season. The corresponding average values for the 2 nd season were1263.36 m 3 fed -1 (30.08 cm), 1089.73m 3 fed -1 (25.95cm) and 916.13 m 3 fed -1 (21.81cm).These results were in agreement with those obtained by (Bastos et al, 2012 andOzmen et al, 2015) they stated that, in watermelon, deficit irrigation at 75% ETC saved 25% of irrigation water applied. In addition, data indicate that water saving percent over I 1 -treatment were (13.71 and 13.74%) and (27.37 and 27.48%) for I 2 and I 3 -treatments, respectively in both seasons.…”
Section: Amount Of Water Applied and Water Savingsupporting
confidence: 89%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…(25.99 cm) and 918.72 m 3 fed -1 (21.87cm) for the irrigation level of I 1, I 2 and I 3 , respectively, in the 1 st season. The corresponding average values for the 2 nd season were1263.36 m 3 fed -1 (30.08 cm), 1089.73m 3 fed -1 (25.95cm) and 916.13 m 3 fed -1 (21.81cm).These results were in agreement with those obtained by (Bastos et al, 2012 andOzmen et al, 2015) they stated that, in watermelon, deficit irrigation at 75% ETC saved 25% of irrigation water applied. In addition, data indicate that water saving percent over I 1 -treatment were (13.71 and 13.74%) and (27.37 and 27.48%) for I 2 and I 3 -treatments, respectively in both seasons.…”
Section: Amount Of Water Applied and Water Savingsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…According to the literature, watermelon has high water requirement for high yields, the seasonal water requirement of watermelon vary from 240 to 660mm, depending on the climate and the total length of the growing period (Kirnak and Dogan, 2009;Camoglu et al, 2010;Bastos et al, 2012;Ozmen et al, 2015 andKuscu et al ., 2015). Therefore, irrigation is necessary for optimal vegetative and reproductive development in the periods of insufficient precipitation during the plant production seasons (Sahin et al, 2015).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to (Amaral et al, 2016) the productivity and final quality of the watermelon crop were related to several factors, which acted during all phases of its growth and development. In this study similar acts of growth and development determinant factors related to irrigation, the amount was observed during the period of the experiment at both locations.…”
Section: Yield and Irrigation Depth At Each Treatmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These include plant, soil, cultural practices, environmental factors (Jones et al, 1984;Allen et al, 1998), applied irrigation system (Al-Jamal et al, 2001). Under no limiting irrigated conditions, daily ET rates for individual vegetable crops are directly related to the meteorological processes affecting evaporative demand and to the existing stage of growth development or percent crop coverage (Blaney and Criddle, 1962). According to the literature, watermelon has high water requirement.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to the literature, watermelon has high water requirement. For high yields, the seasonal water requirements of watermelon vary from 240-660 mm, depending on the climate and the total length of the growing period (Erdem and Yuksel, 2003;Kirnak and Dogan, 2009;Bastos et al, 2012;Kuscu et al, 2015).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%