2022
DOI: 10.1002/hyp.14519
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evapotranspiration across the rain–snow transition in a semi‐arid watershed

Abstract: The snowpack regime influences the timing of soil water available for transpiration and synchrony with the evapotranspiration (ET) energy demand (air temperature, VPD, and shortwave radiation). Variability of snowmelt timing, soil water availability, and the energy demand results in heterogeneous ET rates throughout a watershed. In this study, we assessed how ET and growing season length vary across five sites on an elevational gradient in the Dry Creek Watershed, ID, USA. We compared trends of daily and annua… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

2
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 52 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…During wet seasons (e.g., from March to May), the actual ET (ET a ) is assumed to be equal to potential ET (ET p ), and we use ET a measured from MODIS at a nearby site (Kraft & McNamara, 2022; see data points in Figure 2e) to determine the crop factor K c by fitting the calculated ET p during the wet season to ET a . The calculated daily potential ET (ET p ) at the catchment is plotted in Figure 2e.…”
Section: Hydrometeorological Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…During wet seasons (e.g., from March to May), the actual ET (ET a ) is assumed to be equal to potential ET (ET p ), and we use ET a measured from MODIS at a nearby site (Kraft & McNamara, 2022; see data points in Figure 2e) to determine the crop factor K c by fitting the calculated ET p during the wet season to ET a . The calculated daily potential ET (ET p ) at the catchment is plotted in Figure 2e.…”
Section: Hydrometeorological Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The reference ET 0 in the Penman‐Monteith equation is expressed as normalET0=0.408Δ()RnG+γ900T+273u2()eseaΔ+γ()1+0.34u2, $\mathrm{E}{\mathrm{T}}_{0}=\frac{0.408{\Delta }\left({R}_{\mathrm{n}}-G\right)+\gamma \frac{900}{T+273}{u}_{2}\left({e}_{\mathrm{s}}-{e}_{\mathrm{a}}\right)}{{\Delta }+\gamma \left(1+0.34{u}_{2}\right)},$ where R n is the net radiation at the crop surface, G is the soil heat flux density, T is the mean daily air temperature 2 m above the ground, u 2 is the wind speed 2 m above the ground, e s is the saturation vapor pressure, e a is the actual vapor pressure, Δ is the slope of the vapor pressure curve, and γ is psychrometric constant. The reference ET (ET 0 ) can be linked to potential ET (ET p ) by a crop coefficient K c , expressed as ETp=KcET0. ${\text{ET}}_{\mathrm{p}}={K}_{\mathrm{c}}{\text{ET}}_{0}.$ During wet seasons (e.g., from March to May), the actual ET (ET a ) is assumed to be equal to potential ET (ET p ), and we use ET a measured from MODIS at a nearby site (Kraft & McNamara, 2022; see data points in Figure 2e) to determine the crop factor K c by fitting the calculated ET p during the wet season to ET a . The calculated daily potential ET (ET p ) at the catchment is plotted in Figure 2e.…”
Section: Study Site and Field Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As ET is further limited by the amount of available moisture in the soil, and hence related to precipitation input as well as to seasonal snow, we compared differences in ET to differences in precipitation input itself, as well as to differences in total snow water. We were able to link differences in simulated ET between model configurations with regards to meteorological forcing data to differences in total snow water, highlighting the importance of rain-snow transitions for ET calculations and further underlining results from Kraft and McNamara (2022). We were, however, not able to directly link differences between model configurations to differences in precipitation input.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 73%
“…With changing melt rates, it is unclear how changes in the timing and rate of snowmelt will affect the amount of melt that goes to ET. Previous work suggests that lower snow accumulation and earlier melt may lead to earlier increases in ET and the start of the growing season (Cooper et al, 2020; Hamlet et al, 2007; Kraft & McNamara, 2022). If this is the case, more snowmelt may go to ET and less to groundwater recharge and annual runoff (Barnhart et al, 2016; Christensen et al, 2021; Goulden & Bales, 2014).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%