1978
DOI: 10.1103/physrevc.18.2603
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaporation residue products from reactions withKr86

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

1980
1980
1984
1984

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…10 -2l S), whereas the lifetime for neutron emission is much longer on the average. Strong, although somewhat indirect support for this result comes also from a number of studies in which the mass and (or) charge lost by each fragment was deduced from detailed analyses of the heavy fragments alone [8][9][10][11]. The evidence discussed above tends to throw doubt on our earlier suggestion of pre-equilibrium effects in the system 132Xe+197Au [-1~.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 77%
“…10 -2l S), whereas the lifetime for neutron emission is much longer on the average. Strong, although somewhat indirect support for this result comes also from a number of studies in which the mass and (or) charge lost by each fragment was deduced from detailed analyses of the heavy fragments alone [8][9][10][11]. The evidence discussed above tends to throw doubt on our earlier suggestion of pre-equilibrium effects in the system 132Xe+197Au [-1~.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 77%
“…4 are obtained. This shape of the angular distributions is the most probable one as can be deduced from previous work [2,3]. To illustrate the margin of the uncertainty due to the eventually missing cross section at angles below 3 ~ Fig.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…21 we indicate the quasi-elastic transfer cross sections with TKEL of 0_ 10 MeV (this represents twice the measured charge transfer cross section -assuming as an upper limit that single neutron transfer contributes the same amount). For the formation of a compound nucleus the limits in l can be inferred from the work of Plasil et al [37], who measured the evaporation residue cross section for a6Kr+9~ at 366MeV of 248_+75mb, which yields IcN = 55 + 9 h. The total fusion cross section of ~=497 mb from [37] gives a value for Ic~ =79 h, which is a theoretical result for a vanishing fission barrier. These values should be compared with the theoretical results of Table 8 These values compare rather favourably with critical angular momenta for fusion obtained in the analysis of the deep-inelastic events (Sect.…”
Section: Overview On Cross Sectionsmentioning
confidence: 97%