1987
DOI: 10.1016/s0376-7388(00)80032-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaporation of alcohol/water mixtures through hydrophobic porous membranes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

1996
1996
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 48 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In particular, VMD was also investigated as a tool for the continuous removal of ethanol from fermentation broths in order to increase the bioreactor productivity (Hofman et al, 1987;Aptel et al, 1988).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In particular, VMD was also investigated as a tool for the continuous removal of ethanol from fermentation broths in order to increase the bioreactor productivity (Hofman et al, 1987;Aptel et al, 1988).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…VMD technology has been applied for the treatment of dilute alcohol water solutions [14,16,18,22,23,41,51].…”
Section: Treatment Of Alcohol Aqueous Solutionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The contact angle measurement was usually carried out within 3-5 h of the plasma treatment. Until now, most of the contact angle measurements of membrane characterization have been made on hydrophobic membranes used for pervaporation or gas permeation, [25][26][27][28] and on porous hydrophilic or hydrophobic membrane used for Microfiltration (MF) or Ultrafiltration (UF). 29,30 Fane et al 29 correlated flux decline with variation of membrane hydrophilicity, while Oldani and Schock 30 showed that hydrophilic membranes do have better flux recoveries.…”
Section: Contact Anglementioning
confidence: 99%