1971
DOI: 10.1016/0017-9310(71)90087-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaporation of a solid into vacuum

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

1975
1975
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…There exists a variety of models describing the Knudsen layer at different scales and levels of detail. 20,[24][25][26][49][50][51][52][53][54] One particular approach treats the Knudsen layer as a gas dynamic discontinuity. 24,25 Here, analytical expressions can be derived that interrelate temperature, pressure, density, and velocity along the target surface and the outer side of the Knudsen layer, respectively.…”
Section: Surface Mass Removalmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There exists a variety of models describing the Knudsen layer at different scales and levels of detail. 20,[24][25][26][49][50][51][52][53][54] One particular approach treats the Knudsen layer as a gas dynamic discontinuity. 24,25 Here, analytical expressions can be derived that interrelate temperature, pressure, density, and velocity along the target surface and the outer side of the Knudsen layer, respectively.…”
Section: Surface Mass Removalmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The problem of weak (or low Mach number) evaporation/condensation has been solved using linear perturbation theory [8,44,45]. To describe strong evaporation, Anisimov [6,46] applied a moment method based on the collision-invariant moments of the BTE (i.e., mass, momentum, and energy), adapting methods developed for the study of the shock wave structure. Ytrehus [7] developed this moment method further and with Alvestad [47] extended it to condensation.…”
Section: Knudsen Layermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A simple order of magnitude estimate is carried out for an ablation crater supposed for simplicity cylindrical with radius r c and depth h c ; if a given laser fluence and dwell time τ d are consistent with a density n e , then the total number of free electrons to be thermalized is n c = πh c r 2 c n e ; on the other hand, if the characteristic equipartition time is τ t , then τ d /τ t electrons are effectively allowed to thermalize in the given irradiation conditions. Hence the thermalization condition is actually possible or not depending on, respectively, τ d /τ t > πh c r 2 c n e or τ d /τ t < πh c r 2 c n e . As expected, τ d and pulse fluence control the occurring of either situation; clearly the latter must be small enough to allow a sufficiently low production rate of electrons and the former long enough to allow thermalizing all of them.…”
Section: The Physical Model Of Thermal Ablation and Plasma Generationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However the formation of a cloud of dense plasma by intense vaporization of solid and liquid surfaces becomes crucial to enable keyhole welding, drilling, cutting and also for thin film deposition techniques based on pulsed laser etching of metals and superconductors. The problem of describing the formation and properties of the plasma plume is very complex and involves several topics of multidisciplinary interest [1][2][3]. A collection of experimental and theoretical papers on ablation is reported in [4].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%