2006
DOI: 10.22163/fteval.2006.178
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluierung des Kompetenzaufbaus für angewandte FuE an Fachhochschulen durch die KTU/CTI 1998 – 2004. Endbericht

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
2
1
1

Relationship

1
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…4 Geyer (2004), Düring et al (2006), Steiner et al (2006), Gerhardter und Gruber (2010), Warta und Geyer (2011), Dinges et al (2014) 5 Mayer et al (2006), Wissenschaftsrat (2010); Kiener et al (2012), Österreichischer Wissenschaftsrat (2012, HBO-raad (2010a) 6.000 I K T -A n w e n d u n g e n E le k t r o n ik , M ik r o e le k t r o n ik N ic h t z u g e o r d n e t M e s s v e r f a h r e n S o z ia le A s p e k t e S o n s t ig e E n e r g ie t h e m e n I n f o r m a t io n s v e r a r b e it u n g , -s y s t e m e A u t o m a t is ie r u n g I n d u s t r ie ll e F e r t ig u n g W e r k s t o ff t e c h n ik S o n s t ig e T e c h n o lo g ie I n f o r m a t io n , M e d ie n B io t e c h n o lo g ie P r o je k t m a n a g e m e n t m e t h o d e n E n e r g ie e in s p a r u n g S ic h e r h e it ( S a f e t y ) M a t h e m a t ik , S t a t is t ik L u f t -u n d R a u m f a h r t t e c h n o lo g ie T e le k o m m u n ik a t io n V e r k e h r W ir t s c h a f t li c h e A s p e k t e I n n o v a t io n , T e c h n o lo g ie t r a n s f e r I n d u s t r ie ll e B io t e c h n o lo g ie E n e r g ie s p e ic h e r u n g , -t r a n s p o r t N a n o t e c h n o lo g ie , -w is s e n s c h a f t e n R e g e n e r a t iv e E n e r g ie t r ä g e r B a u t e c h n ik S o n s t ig e F o r s c h u n g u n d E n t w ic k lu n g A u s b il d u n g , S c h u lu n g N e t z w e r k t e c h n o lo g ie n S o n s t ig e ( u n t e r 1 0 0 T s d . € B a r w e r t ) 6.000 I K T -A n w e n d u n g e n E le k t r o n ik , M ik r o e le k t r o n ik N ic h t z u g e o r d n e t M e s s v e r f a h r e n S o z ia le A s p e k t e S o n s t ig e E n e r g ie t h e m e n I n f o r m a t io n s v e r a r b e it u n g , -s y s t e m e A u t o m a t is ie r u n g I n d u s t r ie ll e F e r t ig u n g W e r k s t o ff t e c h n ik S o n s t ig e T e c h n o lo g ie I n f o r m a t io n , M e d ie n B io t e c h n o lo g ie P r o je k t m a n a g e m e n t m e t h o d e n E n e r g ie e in s p a r u n g S ic h e r h e it ( S a f e t y ) M a t h e m a t ik , S t a t is t ik L u f t -u n d R a u m f a h r t t e c h n o lo g ie T e le k o m m u n ik a t io n V e r k e h r W ir t s c h a f t li c h e A s p e k t e I n n o v a t io n , T e c h n o lo g ie t r a n s f e r I n d u s t r ie ll e B io t e c h n o lo g ie E n e r g ie s p e ic h e r u n g , -t r a n s p o r t N a n o t e c h n o lo g ie , -w is s e n s c h a f t e n R e g e n e r a t iv e E n e r g ie t r ä g e r B a u t e c h n ik S o n s t ig e F o r s c h u n g u n d E n t w ic k lu n g A u s b il d u n g , S c h u lu n g N e t z w e r k t e c h n o lo g ie n S o n s t ig e ( u n t e r 1 0 0 T s d .…”
Section: Fazit Und Empfehlungenmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…4 Geyer (2004), Düring et al (2006), Steiner et al (2006), Gerhardter und Gruber (2010), Warta und Geyer (2011), Dinges et al (2014) 5 Mayer et al (2006), Wissenschaftsrat (2010); Kiener et al (2012), Österreichischer Wissenschaftsrat (2012, HBO-raad (2010a) 6.000 I K T -A n w e n d u n g e n E le k t r o n ik , M ik r o e le k t r o n ik N ic h t z u g e o r d n e t M e s s v e r f a h r e n S o z ia le A s p e k t e S o n s t ig e E n e r g ie t h e m e n I n f o r m a t io n s v e r a r b e it u n g , -s y s t e m e A u t o m a t is ie r u n g I n d u s t r ie ll e F e r t ig u n g W e r k s t o ff t e c h n ik S o n s t ig e T e c h n o lo g ie I n f o r m a t io n , M e d ie n B io t e c h n o lo g ie P r o je k t m a n a g e m e n t m e t h o d e n E n e r g ie e in s p a r u n g S ic h e r h e it ( S a f e t y ) M a t h e m a t ik , S t a t is t ik L u f t -u n d R a u m f a h r t t e c h n o lo g ie T e le k o m m u n ik a t io n V e r k e h r W ir t s c h a f t li c h e A s p e k t e I n n o v a t io n , T e c h n o lo g ie t r a n s f e r I n d u s t r ie ll e B io t e c h n o lo g ie E n e r g ie s p e ic h e r u n g , -t r a n s p o r t N a n o t e c h n o lo g ie , -w is s e n s c h a f t e n R e g e n e r a t iv e E n e r g ie t r ä g e r B a u t e c h n ik S o n s t ig e F o r s c h u n g u n d E n t w ic k lu n g A u s b il d u n g , S c h u lu n g N e t z w e r k t e c h n o lo g ie n S o n s t ig e ( u n t e r 1 0 0 T s d . € B a r w e r t ) 6.000 I K T -A n w e n d u n g e n E le k t r o n ik , M ik r o e le k t r o n ik N ic h t z u g e o r d n e t M e s s v e r f a h r e n S o z ia le A s p e k t e S o n s t ig e E n e r g ie t h e m e n I n f o r m a t io n s v e r a r b e it u n g , -s y s t e m e A u t o m a t is ie r u n g I n d u s t r ie ll e F e r t ig u n g W e r k s t o ff t e c h n ik S o n s t ig e T e c h n o lo g ie I n f o r m a t io n , M e d ie n B io t e c h n o lo g ie P r o je k t m a n a g e m e n t m e t h o d e n E n e r g ie e in s p a r u n g S ic h e r h e it ( S a f e t y ) M a t h e m a t ik , S t a t is t ik L u f t -u n d R a u m f a h r t t e c h n o lo g ie T e le k o m m u n ik a t io n V e r k e h r W ir t s c h a f t li c h e A s p e k t e I n n o v a t io n , T e c h n o lo g ie t r a n s f e r I n d u s t r ie ll e B io t e c h n o lo g ie E n e r g ie s p e ic h e r u n g , -t r a n s p o r t N a n o t e c h n o lo g ie , -w is s e n s c h a f t e n R e g e n e r a t iv e E n e r g ie t r ä g e r B a u t e c h n ik S o n s t ig e F o r s c h u n g u n d E n t w ic k lu n g A u s b il d u n g , S c h u lu n g N e t z w e r k t e c h n o lo g ie n S o n s t ig e ( u n t e r 1 0 0 T s d .…”
Section: Fazit Und Empfehlungenmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since the former schools had very limited research experience, the Confederation developed an active promotion policy; in 1997 additional means were provided to the Swiss Innovation Agency (CTI) to coach UAS in the development of research (Conseil fédéral 1997; Mayer et al 2006); moreover, national competence networks were financed to promote cooperation between UAS in specific fields. At the same time, the Swiss Innovation Agency received a strong budget increase and was largely reoriented to support UAS.…”
Section: The Emergence Of a New Research Actormentioning
confidence: 99%